By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - HAs sony abandoned move/ps4 camera?

FinalFantasyXIII on 26 January 2014

Killzone SF not having it seems strange. If inFamous 2nd son lacks it maybe Sony is done with Move in their 1st party titles?



Around the Network
DonFerrari on 26 January 2014

Couldn't Sony add Move controls through Patches like they done to Resident Evil?

A lot of PS4 functionalities seems to be promissed but will be added later. Maybe move support for 1st parties will come son.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

FinalFantasyXIII on 26 January 2014
DonFerrari said:
Couldn't Sony add Move controls through Patches like they done to Resident Evil?

A lot of PS4 functionalities seems to be promissed but will be added later. Maybe move support for 1st parties will come son.


You're correct they did it with RE5 Gold Edition (patched MOVE support). I forgot about that patch for a second. Then again that is a 3rd party title. I'm not sure if any Sony 1st party games have ever been patched with MOVE support after release. hmmmm



FlamingWeazel on 26 January 2014
vivster said:
FlamingWeazel said:
vivster said:
ethomaz said:
Move is integrated to Dual Shock 4... the led have this function.

That was an excuse to justify that godawful glowing light. Sure it probably works but no one in his right mind would use the DS4 as a motion controller. It doesn't even have a strap.


Why would sony add a light for no reason??? You make no sense LMAO at a controller needing a strap.

All motion controllers have straps. Ethomaz argued that the DS4 could be used as motion controller. Nobody will.

Why would they make a big glowing light on the back? The same reason why they would laugh at gamers who don't like that light and refuse to add the option to turn it off. Because they're dicks.

Controllers dont need straps they have handles..other ones do because they do not have handles and are straight.

 

Yes sony are doing it just to be mean..please.

 

 

The light also identifies the player, for instrance 4 friends at a house playing NHL against each other, ever lay down your controller and forget who owns what controller? This fixes that. Also games are alrady using the motion shadow fall does. There goesyour argument.



vivster on 26 January 2014
FlamingWeazel said:

Yes sony are doing it just to be mean..please.

Of course they are dicks. That's why they refuse to make the light optional. You know for people who don't play with a hundred friends or swing it around like a motion controller.

They are doing this to specifically annoy me.  Only explanation.



If you demand respect or gratitude for your volunteer work, you're doing volunteering wrong.

Around the Network
FlamingWeazel on 26 January 2014
vivster said:
FlamingWeazel said:

Yes sony are doing it just to be mean..please.

Of course they are dicks. That's why they refuse to make the light optional. You know for people who don't play with a hundred friends or swing it around like a motion controller.

They are doing this to specifically annoy me.  Only explanation.

There is no need to make it optional. Your blowing a tiny thing out of proportion/.



leo-j on 26 January 2014

The camera sells out tho



 

mM
vivster on 26 January 2014
FlamingWeazel said:
vivster said:
FlamingWeazel said:

Yes sony are doing it just to be mean..please.

Of course they are dicks. That's why they refuse to make the light optional. You know for people who don't play with a hundred friends or swing it around like a motion controller.

They are doing this to specifically annoy me.  Only explanation.

There is no need to make it optional. Your blowing a tiny thing out of proportion/.

Tiny thing for you, big dealbreaker for me.

It absolutely limits my enjoyment of the games I am playing in my dark room. So that's obviously their goal since they refuse to  change it for me.

400€ console but forgot to code a light switch. Well they didn't forget to code it because developers have full control over the light. But god forbid users get that switch in their hands. Unthinkable that some gamers wouldn't want a flashlight on their tv or like to play longer than 7h straight.

For the gamers!



If you demand respect or gratitude for your volunteer work, you're doing volunteering wrong.

FlamingWeazel on 26 January 2014
vivster said:
FlamingWeazel said:
vivster said:
FlamingWeazel said:

Yes sony are doing it just to be mean..please.

Of course they are dicks. That's why they refuse to make the light optional. You know for people who don't play with a hundred friends or swing it around like a motion controller.

They are doing this to specifically annoy me.  Only explanation.

There is no need to make it optional. Your blowing a tiny thing out of proportion/.

Tiny thing for you, big dealbreaker for me.

It absolutely limits my enjoyment of the games I am playing in my dark room. So that's obviously their goal since they refuse to  change it for me.

400€ console but forgot to code a light switch. Well they didn't forget to code it because developers have full control over the light. But god forbid users get that switch in their hands. Unthinkable that some gamers wouldn't want a flashlight on their tv or like to play longer than 7h straight.

For the gamers!

LMAO>



zuvuyeay on 26 January 2014

next gen wonderbook & eyepet incoming

cameras will probably be used a lot for social stuff this gen i assume if people have teh options to have their own webstreams for whatever reason



                                                                                                                                        Above & Beyond