?? What? 720p? 6 versus 6? On pc and 360? Nothing about that game has anything to do with cloud or could not be done on any platform. Only reason it is exclusive is monr.y

Underdeliver?

They promise 4k gaming on Xbox One with teh cloud

yeah

Haters gonna hate but nonthing can be done about it. March 11 cant come soon enough. LMAO

Is this a joke thread ?
Hahahahahaha.

Brought to you by Playstation 3 Cell,

Uncharted 2,
Uncharted 3.
God Of War 3,
God Of War Ascension.
Killzone 3.
M.A.G.
Starhawk
And the acclaimed 2013 Game Of The Year The Last Of Us.........

Some of the finest games of 2012/ 2013 were created because of the Playstation 3 Cell....

Xbox1 cloud has yet to prove itself.

So you ignore everything I said. march 11 isn;t going to change anything, ps4 will still be the #1 console this gen.

I am a consumer. I dont care about who is in 1st place. Let Microsoft and Sony battle over that. All I care about is games and like I said, March 11 cant come soon enough.

I love it, people are under the assumption that the Cell made up for all of the Playstation 3's deficiencies.
It's a slow cost-sensitive processor, not capable of rendering advanced 3D graphics, you can't expect high-end performance in a console, it's rediculous.

The Cell was mostly used to augment graphics like some framebuffer effects or using CPU time to decompress highly compressed Textures/Normal Maps or using an edge-based blurr filter as a cheap form of Anti-Aliasing.
Which to be honest, the Xbox 360 could do anyway, just far less of it.
The Cell isn't performing Tessellation, advanced Shader effects, superior Shadowing and lighting all with thousands of units on screen.

Anyway. - Most games on console use and abuse 3rd party game engines like the Unreal/Gamebryo amongst others which really don't push any boundries at all in terms of image quality, it's really only the developers who are exclusive to a platform that will take advantage of a systems particular nuances to make their game shine in the graphics department.
We saw that with Naught Dog's games and we also saw that with 343i's Halo 4 all of which looked amazing by console graphics standards.

The Cell... Was a waste of time, money and transisters, which could have been better spent on more Ram or a better graphics processor.

The best looking games weren't even on console, the PC was, has and will always have the best graphics and if you wan't scale... Try playing a game called "Sins of a Solar Empire".
You can be staring at a small mining ship orbiting a planet... And zoom right out past a solar system, to see multiple galaxies with thousands of units/objects on screen.

Why are you on a sales site then? Uncharted, the order, infamous, Drive club, MLB the show, Deep Down...i'm good. Plus tonnes of third party support, games aren;t an issue.

Yes. It will offer a benefit but not even nearly as big as Xbox fans say it's going to be - just like what happened with Cell. Also, it won't offer clearly visible benefits until maybe years from now, just like Cell. It will, though, offer small benefits right away, but those benefits will be mostly invisible.

I think it's unfair to say that the cell processor ever really undelivered. It never really had the chance to reveal it's full potential after Sony put too much weight on it to make for the system's lack of RAM. Despite all of this, we still saw the generation's best looking games in Uncharted 3 and The Last of US.

The problem, I think, with the cloud is that noone really knows about it. It's all just Microsoft per se, and people just kind of go with it. Sony at least demonstrated the potential of the cell processor to build up hype.