pezus said:
But aren't we talking about gaming here? Samsung don't have a gaming department, as far as I know. |
of course we are talking about games. It was a bit off topic, but the point still remain
pezus said:
But aren't we talking about gaming here? Samsung don't have a gaming department, as far as I know. |
of course we are talking about games. It was a bit off topic, but the point still remain
pezus said:
That's not what he's saying. It's not "either/ or". |
the title reminded me of a couple of things said by some people a while ago
R.I.P Mr Iwata :'( | ||
Dream_While_Awake said: Gaming in general is not THAT important... |
this
curl-6 said:
So much incorrect assumption here. I do not have narrow interests or little exposure. I enjoy everything from FPS games to platformers to racers, and I've owned and enjoyed non-Nintendo consoles in the 4th, 5th, 6th, and 7th gens. And I yet I still hold that Nintendo make the best games in the industry bar none. |
If you're saying you enjoy Nintendo games more than any other publishers in the industry, that's certainly fair. But "best" is an entirely different beast because quality is subjective, which was the point I was trying to make. Some people prefer games with more depth, or more complex mechanics, or a more mature or thought-provoking narrative, so to say one company, which specializes in games typically weaker in these categories, is "best" seems to be to be a very narrow view. It's like saying Pixar is better than Warner Brothers, despite the fact they make very different movies.
I believe in honesty, civility, generosity, practicality, and impartiality.
I love Nintendo games, but the last time the really pushed the boundaries was with Galaxy. I don't think they are trying that hard anymore.
wow Nintendo arent very popular today, is there something in the water?? :D
Locknuts said:
this |
Heresy! Burn it!
In all seriousness, that's true, but all things being relative...
I believe in honesty, civility, generosity, practicality, and impartiality.
pezus said:
? I'm inclined to say Sony produces games in a lot more genres than Nintendo (some being more popular than others). They have: RPG, Action/adventures, platformers, arcade racers, simulation racers, futuristic racers, puzzle games, sports games, open world games, superhero games (hey, you count "snowboarding" as one genre), games that let you create, games that don't fit a genre, FPS, TPS, casual games etc. And this list would grow quite a bit if you include all the 3rd party games on Sony platforms that never see the light of day on Nintendo's. |
Didn't know they covered that much thanks. If Sony and Nintendo go, they will leave a huge impact in the gaming industry, but few publishers are going to even intend on making 2D and 3D platforms. Nintendo got that covered with Mario, DK, and Kirby. Sony makes amazing games no doubt, but EA, Ubisoft, and 2K can try to fill in (to an extent) what Sony left behind.
Mythmaker1 said:
If you're saying you enjoy Nintendo games more than any other publishers in the industry, that's certainly fair. But "best" is an entirely different beast because quality is subjective, which was the point I was trying to make. Some people prefer games with more depth, or more complex mechanics, or a more mature or thought-provoking narrative, so to say one company, which specializes in games typically weaker in these categories, is "best" seems to be to be a very narrow view. It's like saying Pixar is better than Warner Brothers, despite the fact they make very different movies. |
Quality is indeed subjective; hence it is my subjective view that Nintendo's games are the best in the industry, and I say that as someone with extensive experience in non-Nintendo games.
Mensrea said: I love Nintendo games, but the last time the really pushed the boundaries was with Galaxy. I don't think they are trying that hard anymore. |
Xenoblade.