Still 28nm....................................
The twiter link doesn't work.
Isn't 10 GB an odd number? Titan has 6 GB so that would make 12 on a dual GPU card, and the 780Ti has 3GB that would be 6 GB.
Oh, and I want to see the power consumption figures for that beast.
Please excuse my bad English.
Former gaming PC: i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070
Current gaming PC: R5-7600, 32GB RAM 6000MT/s (CL30) and a RX 9060XT 16GB
Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.
Conina said:
Unless history repeats itself. In the year that followed the start of the 7th console generation, GPU peformance made a major leap:
The single GPU 8800 GTX was up to 50% faster than the (only a few months older) dual GPU 7950 GX2, less noisy, cooler temperatures and no SLI problems. Perhaps Nvidia steps up its game again. They have to compete again with a fresh console generation and even the names are similar: 8800 GTX > 7950 GX2 (2006), GTX 880 > GTX 790 (2014) |
This is aincent hisotry your listing here. The launch of the console generation has very little to do with current high end GPU market. Its not like these consoles are pushing PC GPUs in terms of performance.
Look at more moden history...
GTX 590 > GTX 680
GTX 690 > GTX 780/Titan/Ti
In strict business sense, something Nvidia is very good at as of late...its very doubtful you will see more than 25% performance improvement with Maxwell over 780 Ti.
RenCutypoison said:
|
you mean her? , she doesn't need that much memory, animation isn't as resource heavy as when you take control of things, but even with that, she's not that much textured to have heavy load on memory, her hair uses the same tech as "TressFX" in tomb Raider, her corset uses the same tech as most games that use cloth physics. lighting and all that is standard stuff. I say you'd need 4 GB DDR5 memory to run her.
PullusPardus said:
you mean her? , she doesn't need that much memory, animation isn't as resource heavy as when you take control of things, but even with that, she's not that much textured to have heavy load on memory, her hair uses the same tech as "TressFX" in tomb Raider, her corset uses the same tech as most games that use cloth physics. lighting and all that is standard stuff. I say you'd need 4 GB DDR5 memory to run her. |
I meant the whole movie ^_-
BTW she has a more than a thousand "hair" objects. They had to create an original software to render her hair.
It was a nightmare to animate and to render.
But that movie is what 4 years old by now ? Maybe longer since they began work on it. I'm sure this new card, if 100% correct spec wise, would help 10fold now a days. It's amazing at the rate in which we are shrinking, adding insane ram, cores, new technology etc etc to these cards compared to the old TNT 2 days if anyone remembers that. Makes you wonder what will things be like 4 years from now and how will current consoles be able to compete ?
Then again this card seems more for the individual running 4k monitors with cruise 3 maxed out.
Side note anyone pick up that 4k 39" monitor from sears for Black Friday @ sub 500$? If so how is it?
| Demensha said: Side note anyone pick up that 4k 39" monitor from sears for Black Friday @ sub 500$? If so how is it? |
A friend of mine that works at TigerDirect got it. The Seiki 39 inch...
His summary is as follows:
- As a TV for watching, its meh unless you watch 4K content
- As a gaming display its unusable cause it doesn't 4K at 30Hz
- As a PC monitor for desktop and productivity its awesome. Lots of screen realestate...
It looks juicy, I fully expect there to be an nVidia tax though. :(
www.youtube.com/@Pemalite
| Munkeh111 said: And cost $1,000.... Just going to have to keep waiting for there to be a meaningful upgrade on my 670 at the same price level |
If this were real, it would cost way over a thousand dollars.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2026 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
