By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Blah blah blah, Wii-U doomed, blah blah blah

Skeeuk said:
the difference is wiiu is a difficult choice to have when you have P.S.4 + Xbox1 for sale

wiiu will get a life long shaft by devs hence there's no point in getting one unless you want te play Nintendo games only


Or if you want a cheaper console with free online.



Around the Network

I'll tell ya what. I used to worry about the Wii U being underpowered and that may very well be the case. All I know is that I've been playing Forza Horizon for the last couple of hours and Beyond Two Souls for a few weeks. The amount of detail in these two games is staggering. Perhaps if I put up a screen shot and scrutinized it, I'd notice the flaws but with the games running, they are beautiful. This is running on 2005-2006 consoles. All signs point to the Wii U being more powerful than the PS3/360 so if a studio puts the kind of effort behind Wii U games that companies like Turn 10, Quantic Dream, Naughty Dog, or Santa Monica did with other 7th gen consoles, the Wii U will have some great looking titles.

Keep the good games coming and Wii U will be fine.



Navane said:

I think it's kinda funny how everyone is saying the Wii-U is doomed and that it failed as a console. I don't get involved with these aruguments because, quite frankly, I don't care. I've been a gamer since day one, and I grew up with Nintendo and Sony. There will always be great games for me to play no matter what system I own so I don't worry about defending one system over another. It's a company's job to persuade me as a gamer to buy their system and games. Period.

But I think it's a pretty safe thing to say that yes the Wii-U did fail...in its first year. But what people seem to be forgetting is that this console still has at least another four years to go before Nintendo will even think about releasing a successor. In that time the Wii-U will be procuring some strong games under its belt and will come out a strong system when everything is said and done. Everyone called doom on the PS3 since it was a huge disaster when that first released, but Sony has come a very long way with its system and finished strongly. I fully believe that its very ambitious and pre-mature to call the Wii-U a "failure" and people will just have to wait patently for the games to start rolling in. In three years the Wii-U will have hit its stride and Wii-U owners will have nothing to worry about.

Everyone! Stop being with all the  bullshit negativity and just wait for things to get better. 

...its first year when it had no competition and could have cornered the market.

That is a pretty large blunder. Now that the other 2 are out and rocking more power and will gain momentum, it has less chance of picking up. If it failed then, it will fail for sure now. 

The PS3 was not a huge disaster. It sold little due to the HUGE price tag which slowly came down. The WiiU has no excuses like that.



We don't want Wii U to fail, kid. We simply...need it to...do you understand?



I think we can all agree that these sorts of threads are definitely not doomed.



Around the Network
Salnax said:
Skeeuk said:
the difference is wiiu is a difficult choice to have when you have P.S.4 + Xbox1 for sale

wiiu will get a life long shaft by devs hence there's no point in getting one unless you want te play Nintendo games only


Or if you want a cheaper console with free online.

Which isn't of much use to you, if none of the online games you'd normally play don't release on Wii U or have such a low userbase that online play simply has to be a lag fest. Thus you don't play third party online games and are once again left with...oh yeah Nintendo games.



thewayofthepath said:
I think we can all agree that these sorts of threads are definitely not doomed.


I wonder which one we get more of-- Threads from desperate people trying to convince us that the Wii U is doomed or desperate threads trying to convince us that it's not doomed?



Kinda off topic but I think the Wii U should have launched next year. They needed it last year because the Wii was so outdated but Nintendo always launches late.

Nes--no competition really so....yeah.
Super Nes--launched two years after the competition.
N64--launched a year after the competition.
Gamecube--launched a year after PS2 (same time as Xbox, though)
Wii--launched a year after Xbox 360 (same time as PS3, though)

Nintendo NEVER launches first. They sit back and see what everybody else is committed to and what does/doesn't work and then they come and shake things up (with the exception of the Gamecube which shook up nothing).



Sorry, but Nintendo has been thinking about releasing thesuccessor for about a year now. The performance of the wii u would influence Nintendo on when though. On top of that, you say you dont get involved but what do you call this



Salnax said:
Skeeuk said:
the difference is wiiu is a difficult choice to have when you have P.S.4 + Xbox1 for sale

wiiu will get a life long shaft by devs hence there's no point in getting one unless you want te play Nintendo games only


Or if you want a cheaper console with free online.


...with inferior hardware and online structure