that logic makes no sense at all considering trophies and achievements are 100% optional

Well, I agree. There are two different crowds of RPG fans, the more mainstream RPG gamers that play games like Chrono Trigger, Pokemon, Dragon Quest, Final Fantasy, of which Nintendo has of abundance in their audience. Then there are the RPGs meant for basement-nerds which include stuff like the dungeon of dragons and Dark Soul.

The basement-nerd type RPGs don't really appeal to Nintendo fans. Basement-nerds usually hate Nintendo and would never by a Nintendo system.

Yea, but if I played the game on PS3/360 and didn'thorde then I'll end up with somthing like 20-60% of the trophy's/achievements. Just makes me feel like I half assed the game, but on WiiU I don't have to care at all.

Plus if I did care about troophy's, I won't have to open some collectables guide, which can spoil part of the game for me. I'd much rather play JRPG's on WiiU then PS3/360.

So much wrong with this....

First of all you're over-generalizing. XenoBlade, Last Story, and Pandora's Tower are 3 JRPG's which are not mainstream, and also Nintendo. So with your category's no one wants these games, yet XenoBlade sold as well as a typical Tales of title.

Second of all, Dungeons and Dragons is a WRPG Board game. It has a completely different demograph then the JRPG fanbase, so if anything very few people would like both D&D & Dark Souls

Third, I think any truly hardcore JRPG fan is by definition also a Nintendo fan. Like I said above, many of the best JRPG's tend to be Nintendo or Sony exclusives. XenoBlade Chronicles for Wii, as well as Infinite Space for DS, Fire Emblem Awakening for 3DS, Baten Kaitos for Gamecube, Golden Sun for GBA, Tactics Ogre for N64, Chrono Trigger for SNES, etc, etc have been among the best JRPG of their respective generations. How can you be a real hardcore JRPG fan, and not a Nintendo fan at the same time? I fit into this category.

Again just watch Dead Rising Wii, the experience would be so different its not worth anyones time. Is not just the audience, Dark Souls Wii would have never been possible.

Resident Evil 4 had a huge audience in PS2 and the power gap between Gamecube and PS2 wasn't that big so it made perfect sense for Capcom to make the port and even then RE4 PS2 looked obviously downgraded I can't imaging how would Demon/Dark Souls would look in the original Wii. Capcom greedy as they are would have made a Resident Evil 5 port to Wii if they could since theres still an audicence for RE games on Nintendo consoles.

Well, I agree. There are two different crowds of RPG fans, the more mainstream RPG gamers that play games like Chrono Trigger, Pokemon, Dragon Quest, Final Fantasy, of which Nintendo has of abundance in their audience. Then there are the RPGs meant for basement-nerds which include stuff like the dungeon of dragons and Dark Soul.

The basement-nerd type RPGs don't really appeal to Nintendo fans. Basement-nerds usually hate Nintendo and would never by a Nintendo system.

Xenoblade Chronicles was possible on Wii, so I don't see why Dark Souls shouldn't work. But anyways, as I said before, the main reason was probably that the company didn't expected enough sales to justify the effort.

Let's not forget that a big aspect of Dark Souls is its online components.  From the messages, to the cooperation and competition, to even the way the covenants were designed, the game has a huge emphasis on online interaction, which I don't know would have been the same if developed for the original Wii.  It's quite possible that From Software could have created a lower visual fidelity game without the online components, but it may have resulted in a product not nearly as good as the PS3/360 versions.