okay I meant quite near relative. Quite near if you compare VG-chartz estimations with other ones who estimate console sales every now and than. Take the predictions of last month as example, VG-chartz was really quite near the NPD numbers with Xbox one and Xbox 360 predictions and than take a look at how far off michael pachter was with everthing. VG-chartz was quite close with Xbox One, Xbox 360 predictions, they overestimate the WiiU and PS4 just a little bit and they only overestimated the 3DS quite a lot. Pachter was really with everthing so far off, so I think VG is most of the time  quite near and the best thing everytime when they are wrong they adjust their numbers when official numbers arrive.

Everyone who wants to grow a mustache and is insecure about their sexuality.

But it is bull/

I mean how in gods name do you think they come up with there figures?

I used to think they were legit but they are predictions based on god knows what.

Nothing against the site but that is the bottom line.

While I do really like Peer (he and Fran Mirabella are pretty much the only decent IGN staff left) this could've been worded much better. Why not just state that it's based on estimates and regularly has adjustments, etc.

Saying "it's total crap" and "I'm surprised it still exists" just sounds ignorant.

IGN specialises in reviews....ie. Pure opinion, not really anything that can be considered factual.

Calling VGChartz bull is rich. At least VGC make an attempt for accuracy. If IGN think they can do better, I'd like to see them fork out the cash for their own sales section (which I doubt they'd do, in their current, floundering state)

It says the IGNorants.

        IGN of all people...

IGN is the epitome of social media and news outlets of every kind and type. Claiming that they are ignorant is... bull.

I call Sonic Lost World 5.8/10 bull.

I use IGN to hook up with gamers....sexually....with my fingers on the keyboard..... yeah..... im a sad person :(