By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Top 15 all-time software: 100% Nintendo | Top 15 all-time hardware: 53,33% Nintendo. 26,66% Sony, Others 6,66% each

Locknuts said:

@ OP - Not sure if you were replying to me, but I was just keeping Manuel happy. I was being totally sarcastic.


It was a general reply.

The bundled detail is a valid question, but not to Nintendo games. Everyone knows what Wii Sports, Tetris or Pokemon is. 

 

Nobody cares about kinect sports. 



Around the Network

Too bad VGC doesnt have all versions list because this list would be completely different... even though i dont know why anyone would take VGC sw sales seriously anyway



Why isn't Angry Birds on the list?



 

Face the future.. Gamecenter ID: nikkom_nl (oh no he didn't!!) 

Nintendo is so doomed.. third party by 2015 guarenteed!



I want to say rape but that would be an understatement

I do wonder what the top 15 software in terms of ratings go however



                  

PC Specs: CPU: 7800X3D || GPU: Strix 4090 || RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 || Main SSD: WD 2TB SN850

Around the Network
NiKKoM said:
Why isn't Angry Birds on the list?


Because it didn't sell enough copies to beat even the last game on the list.

Or is your question: Why isn't there smartphone and pc games on the list ?

Answer: Because this is dedicated gaming devices only.

 

And to everyone mocking vgchartz numbers: it serves your purpose when you want to make a point, but it doesn't serve when you don't want to swallow facts ? Get the fuck out.



But dat PS2.



Atto Suggests...:

Book - Malazan Book of the Fallen series 

Game - Metro Last Light

TV - Deadwood

Music - Forest Swords 

Another proof that in the technology sector relevance and irrelevance are very close to eachother.



FrancisNobleman said:


Because it didn't sell enough copies to beat even the last game on the list.

Or is your question: Why isn't there smartphone and pc games on the list ?

Answer: Because this is dedicated gaming devices only.

 

And to everyone mocking vgchartz numbers: it serves your purpose when you want to make a point, but it doesn't serve when you don't want to swallow facts ? Get the fuck out.


I think its pretty well accepted that vgc software sales are no where close to real totals and hardware are only close to accurate because of constant reports. I dare you to show me when i ever pointed to vgc to "serve a point." You wont find it. If you cant accept that then you get the fuck out.

Seriously, its a well known fact that vgc database is largely incomplete. Using vgc sw sales is like using wiki in a scool paper as a source. it was even suggested at on point to get rid of sw tracking. Which gained a lot of support but ultimately turned down because "nothing would differentiate vgc then." Ontop of that your comparison is flawed even if VGC sales were complete. And youre telling me to gtfo? Lol. Get a grip



DamnTastic said:
Another proof that in the technology sector relevance and irrelevance are very close to eachother.


How's so ??