HyperionFF said: starcraft said: Wrong.....NPD is the ONLY viable PROFESSIONAL video game sales tracking firm in the US market. Sony, Nintendo and Microsoft all have little choice but to acknowledge them as the primary third-party tracker, and doing so is in no way an indication of their perveived trust in NPD's numbers. | Your argument makes no sense honestly. Do you believe that if any of the big three thought that NPD was not accurately tracking their sales they would still give credit to it with official press releases EVERY MONTH? Do you believe, just to make an example, that if Sony thought that NPD had been undertracking their numbers for all 2007 based on their internal datas they would accept those? Do you believe that if Microsoft knew they outsold both Wii and PS3 this month they would have accepted NPD datas putting them in last place? NPD is the most accurate source we have for US sales data,denying that bring nowhere except to delusion. |
Ok mate start reading, thinking and THEN writing. You said that NPD was "reliable." I would agree that NPD is the most accurate (to use your new word) source available, but calling them a 'reliable' source when they don't track Toys r Us or Walmart and up to three seperate consoles (Wii, DS, 360) are experiencing shortages is a BIG stretch.
I repeat that it is the ONLY professional tracking firm monitoring US sales. When it puts out sales 'statistics' each month, the console manufacturers can hardly say 'well, er....no they are wrong because, um" due to the fact there is no other third party professional firm to compare them too, and the fact console manufacturers don't track sales to consumers. When shipment figures come out for all consoles, I think we will find that BOTH NPD and VGChartz were off substantially for at least one or two consoles, rendering your original argument (that NPD is universally 'reliable') moot.
And FYI, in either November or December (I think the latter) Nintendo didn't release a response to the NPD data.....