LOL, what a cop out !!

He's right though.

I and others looking forward to it are getting it regardless of whether it's 720x1280 or 720x880. It won't affect my enjoyment.

He's right though.

I and others looking forward to it are getting it regardless of whether it's 720x1280 or 720x880. It won't affect my enjoyment.

You have width and height reversed nobody's looking forward to even seeing how horrible it looks at 720x1280.

You have width and height reversed nobody's looking forward to even seeing how horrible it looks at 720x1280.

I don't think anybody has bought COD for it's graphics since 2009. ;)

The wii u is meant to be exceptionally easy to develop for. I know the standard wii u defence is somehow the developers are lazy or the wii u is difficult to develop for but I think we have seen enough games now to see the wii u can struggle easily with frame rates and it is likely the cpu is a weakness. The gpu is meant to have some compute power as well and if that is used to assist the main cpu then it may result in less resources for graphics output. I think there is a clear pattern that games which require high cpu resources  do not perform well on wii u compared to 360 and PS3, sometimes frame rate issues, sometimes graphic issues, sometimes both. Some games have missing cpu intensive features on wii u. 

I personally feel the wii u is performing exactly as expected. You have to factor in the wii u is using the same low coast 40Nm fabrication process as the 360 and PS3 but is consuming far less power even allowing for the lack of a hard drive in wii u. The wii u has 2GB of memory, 4x that of ps3/360. The wii u cpu is on a even cheaper fabrication process of 45Nm. When the x-rays of the wii u gpu were analysed it was said it's performance rating in gflops was between 176-352 gflops and everyone decided 352 gflops was the figure, I guess they were disappointed enough with that figure, that they couldn't imagine it any lower but the evidence is stacking up that 176 gflops is the true figure simply because of the incredibly low power requirements of the chip despite using a very power hungry fabrication process and the gpu doing constant compression for the gamepad and hardware upscaling. 

The point is there is no evidence yet that the wii u performance level is actually higher than ps3 or 360. Most multiformat games on average perform a little better on 360 or PS3. Even recent games. 

This whole concept that the wii u is underperforming for its given specification is based on an assumption by people that the wii u is technically stronger but the evidence points to a console that is both stronger and weaker than current gen models.

I don't think anyone doubts the wii u cpu is weaker than 360 and PS3 do they?  But there are weaknesses in addition to that.

....well ...there mo cap ....dog :3

I don't think anybody has bought COD for it's graphics since 2009. ;)

No doubt, buuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuut:

^What you're talking of (720x1280)

^What it really is (720p res)

I guess that since TWO people didn't notice width and height reversed in that statement, they:

1) Really don't care of graphics

2) Have their heads tilted 90 degrees to the right

P.S: I picked slowpoke randomly, no offense it's just fun looking and inoffensive.