Its not being a stupid gamer, but rather being a smart consumer with standards. $500 for a console which doesn't garantee 1080p is not justified the price, $300 maybe.
Difference in BF is very small and i can easily say Ryse alone can comepete with games like KZ and infamous .. That game alone proves XO is not as weak as people claim it to be. Its obvious that XO version of Ghost was rushed just to meet the deadline . If given more time i am sure it could have easily targeted 1080p. Have console gamers these days become graphic whores that which machIne to buy at launch is determien on how many games can do 1080p at launch? What happen to the old days ,, where its all about gameplay and about having fun rather then how many pixels it can push lol. It seems like people have forgotten about the early days of teh PS3 wher the multiplats difference for teh first years were huge . everythign to unplayable fram rate, resoution , textur detail, blurry , lower AA and so on and the machine was 600 at launch. Despite all of that ,, lot of gamers still bought the machine at launch. At least with XO its playable and the graphics can hold its ground against the PS4 and the difference in multiplats is neglible at best. The package you get at 500 with XO is really good as theres potential with what you cna do with OS and kinect . Yeah i know alot you hate kinect but you can't deny its potential. It just needs someone to make a proper game thats not casusal and thats not dancing lol.
"You can say xboxone full potential will be unlocked later when the devs familiarised themselves with the system but that goes for the PS4 too. " Sure you can say that ,, but to deny the fact that XO is a competitor to the PS4 because of launch games unable to push X amount of pixels,, just shows pure ignorance and fanboyism. A true gamer is someone who can enjoy games that the platforms provides without caring how many pixels its pushing :D