S.T.A.G.E. said:
|
The golden age of the gaming industry.
S.T.A.G.E. said:
|
The golden age of the gaming industry.
Nem said:
The competition is nintendo. Microsoft does not have a different enough offer to actually make any sort of difference. The games market was here and had competition before Microsoft joined. You can bet it will still be here after they leave. |
Why are so many people so hung up on having to pay $50 a year for Live. That's just over $4.00 a month. Most of the people who complain are the same ones who go out and rent games for $7-$8 a pop for a few nights. I have all the systems, I'm not a fanboy of Microsoft (in reality, I've never like MS at all), and have to give them credit, Live is/was by far the best online expierence of the three 7th gen consoles. Period.
Stop hating and start playing.
The days of the PS2 era and its dominance are over.
Individuals had much more disposable income back then. The PS4 will sell-out its initial shipments much like the Xbox One this holiday season - 3 million. However, will the initial success continue onward after the holiday period? That remains to be seen and will most likely not be the case - Sony will have an edge due to the PS4 releasing in Japan.
| BuckStud said: Why are so many people so hung up on having to pay $50 a year for Live. That's just over $4.00 a month. Most of the people who complain are the same ones who go out and rent games for $7-$8 a pop for a few nights. I have all the systems, I'm not a fanboy of Microsoft (in reality, I've never like MS at all), and have to give them credit, Live is/was by far the best online expierence of the three 7th gen consoles. Period. |
I get you're not hung up for something whose maintnance costs are so low they are convered on the game sales.
While on the topic, since its only 4$ a month. You want to give me 4$ a month? Its nothing you're hung up on.
And just to prove your point wrong, i dont think renting games is legal in most of europe. Also, you have no basis for what you are saying. I have both system, the online play experience is exactly the same. Except in one you have to pay for it.
The forums will be like they are right now. I mean, they are already like Sony won everything, can't change much then.
| Nem said:
While on the topic, since its only 4$ a month. You want to give me 4$ a month? Its nothing you're hung up on. And just to prove your point wrong, i dont think renting games is legal in most of europe. Also, you have no basis for what you are saying. I have both system, the online play experience is exactly the same. Except in one you have to pay for it. |
$4 is a pittance.
That's less than 1/4th of the minimum wage here, so you would probably only have to do 10 minuits of work to pay that in a month.

www.youtube.com/@Pemalite
Pemalite said:
|
Its more of a principle thing. I dont like beeing fooled. Besides... it does add up with the years.
For every year you pay live, a PS3 owner gets one more game than you.
Nem said:
|
Don't get me wrong, I completely agree. Paying for online access is downright crap. I'm just not going to get hung-up about it.

www.youtube.com/@Pemalite
It will be better for the gaming business as developers efforts and resources wont have to be wasted on creating multiple copies of the same game
Nobody's perfect. I aint nobody!!!
Killzone 2. its not a fps. it a FIRST PERSON WAR SIMULATOR!!!! ..The true PLAYSTATION 3 launch date and market dominations is SEP 1st ![]()
Xen said:
Hello, 2007-8, how we missed thee... Nintendomination would be fun to see, if only just to see the western third parties bitch, squeal, and then say that Nintendo is the best |
If by "missed" you mean "loathed" lol
Honestly tho, can anyone say that the generations that Sony dominated were bad for anyone? Great for Devs, Great for Customers, Great for Console manufactures unless your name is MS.... but yea.


![]()
PSN:Forevercloud (looking for Soul Sacrifice Partners!!!)