By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - How do you feel about the fast food strike in the USA?

killerzX said:
the2real4mafol said:

if you are so sure that i am wrong, prove it. Show me an economy is free and isn't controlled by government or unions and is successful today or was successful at one point. As far as i know the free market is a myth, it is always controlled in some way. Monopolies and slavery in the past, today regulations, subsidies and trade unions. 

Also, what's wrong with people working together as a collective? And where i come from, workers aren't forced to join anything. 

nothing. nothing is wrong with union. i just dont want people to be forced to be in a union. Given the choice. people generally opt out, because unions are corupt polictical entities that for the past 50 years, had had no incentive to be usefull for the people the supposedly represent.

when you dont have a guaranteed membership base (like the currently do now) they will be forced to improve their "product" or else they will fade into irrelevency.

some goes for businesses, and those dreaded evil corporations. When the freakin government gets involved and either tries to create a market for something, where there just isnt one (read: most green energy/ solar panel companies) or incentivize bad business decisions (like givng risky loans to people who cant afford it or the house), or government just saying screw it, do what ever bad decision you want, make the Volt, etc, if it doesnt pan out for you, we will bail you out.

the free market creates accountability. forces it in fact.

@bold How come China is producing tons of solar panels if there is no market for them? I'm sure they wouldn't make some in mass if it was pointless. And of course, there is no proper market for them yet, it is a new technology. Investment will improve them just like how the car got improved over the years from investment. 

But back to the previous point, i don't believe in forcing anyone to join anything. I just think Trade Unions are important in the work place. I don't think weakening them or abolishing them will solve anything. I just wish they treated a strike as a last resort. 

And also i'm not sure if you approach would work for public services. People need stuff like energy, healthcare, education, transport, food etc. These things can't just go out of business, even though these sectors most likely wouldn't.

But surely you libertarians must believe in some regulations to ensure work is safe and that people aren't forced to work for more than 8 hours a day. And yeah, i agree that some government medling in the economy is not good. Like i don't agree with subsidies because it means a business can be risky and produce too much stuff. Corn farmers show this, as do oil drillers. I also don't agree with the bailouts of 2008 because as far as i'm concerned, those bankers got away with every dodgy deal they did before the housing bubble burst and left everyone else with the mess.

I still want an example of a truly free market being successful at some point. I guess America was at some point?    



Xbox Series, PS5 and Switch (+ Many Retro Consoles)

'When the people are being beaten with a stick, they are not much happier if it is called the people's stick'- Mikhail Bakunin

Prediction: Switch 2 will outsell the PS5 by 2030

Around the Network
the2real4mafol said:
killerzX said:
the2real4mafol said:

if you are so sure that i am wrong, prove it. Show me an economy is free and isn't controlled by government or unions and is successful today or was successful at one point. As far as i know the free market is a myth, it is always controlled in some way. Monopolies and slavery in the past, today regulations, subsidies and trade unions. 

Also, what's wrong with people working together as a collective? And where i come from, workers aren't forced to join anything. 

nothing. nothing is wrong with union. i just dont want people to be forced to be in a union. Given the choice. people generally opt out, because unions are corupt polictical entities that for the past 50 years, had had no incentive to be usefull for the people the supposedly represent.

when you dont have a guaranteed membership base (like the currently do now) they will be forced to improve their "product" or else they will fade into irrelevency.

some goes for businesses, and those dreaded evil corporations. When the freakin government gets involved and either tries to create a market for something, where there just isnt one (read: most green energy/ solar panel companies) or incentivize bad business decisions (like givng risky loans to people who cant afford it or the house), or government just saying screw it, do what ever bad decision you want, make the Volt, etc, if it doesnt pan out for you, we will bail you out.

the free market creates accountability. forces it in fact.

@bold How come China is producing tons of solar panels if there is no market for them? I'm sure they wouldn't make some in mass if it was pointless. And of course, there is no proper market for them yet, it is a new technology. Investment will improve them just like how the car got improved over the years from investment.

because they artifically created a market, by government control of the economy. anyway there's tons of new technologies that have a market, but thats because they are viable in their current state. solar panels arent a viable option, and government subsidies assure that it satays that way. See be artificially created a solar panel market, by "investing" into green energy. There is little incentive for the company to work hard and innovate their product to  state where it would actually survive on its own merits. instead, the has a faux market, and government backing, negating the need to produce an acutally quality product. Why strive to improve, when you have a guarnteed pay check from the government. the free market would do more to improve solar tech then any amount of government interference. 

But back to the previous point, i don't believe in forcing anyone to join anything. I just think Trade Unions are important in the work place. I don't think weakening them or abolishing them will solve anything. I just wish they treated a strike as a last resort. 

well its a good thing that what you believe isnt how things actually are. Because people many times are forced to join the union. Being in construction in my home state, requires you to be in the union. My dad's painting company has to be part of the union, which is why i stopped working for him, i couldnt work as a aprrentice without joining their corrupt union. I would have to pay them my money, just to have that portion of my paycheck into go to electing more statists into public office, funding causes that i despise. Which is why when states become right to work, giving people the option whether to join the union or not. Its vitually unanamous that everyone leaves the union. Becuase they dont see the value in it. Now if everyone had the option to not join the union, said unions, would be forced to improve, or they would lose all of the members and go defunct.

And also i'm not sure if you approach would work for public services. People need stuff like energy, healthcare, education, transport, food etc. These things can't just go out of business, even though these sectors most likely wouldn't.

exactly, which is why there is a market for it, people want and need that stuff. So the company that bests, fulfulls those needs stays in business and thives, the company that doesnt deliver those services with adaquate quality and costs, either go out of business or improve their product. So "green energy" companies would actually have to compete (instead of artificially making the relevent) with others forms of energy to make their product attractive to custommers. So to stay in business they would improve their solar tech. 

But surely you libertarians must believe in some regulations to ensure work is safe and that people aren't forced to work for more than 8 hours a day. And yeah, i agree that some government medling in the economy is not good. Like i don't agree with subsidies because it means a business can be risky and produce too much stuff. Corn farmers show this, as do oil drillers. I also don't agree with the bailouts of 2008 because as far as i'm concerned, those bankers got away with every dodgy deal they did before the housing bubble burst and left everyone else with the mess.

yes, market induced regulations. 8 hour work days, and above median salaries werent union or government introduced ideas. And of course the banks got away with it, the government is the one who told them to do those risky practices. Things like the community reinvestment act, government backed risky loans. The government basicly said, "banks we think its a right for everyone to own a home, so do whatever you have to do to get that family earning $30,000 a year into that $500,000 home. dont worry, if they cant pay it back, we have it insurred, and plus we sold them as government backed securities, so the people that bought them are screwed. lulz"

I still want an example of a truly free market being successful at some point. I guess America was at some point?    





the2real4mafol said:
Kasz216 said:
While this is very long... you didn't actually provide any real arguements.

Why should someone who does the same job, just as well get paid more or less depending on how well other people do their job?

 

As for Germany... guess what Germany doesn't have.  Minimum Wage.

Germany have very strong unions instead that's why

But with all the right wing bullshit in American media, that would never work as for some reason Unions are demonised in America, most of the time. 

Not for fast food and other minium wage type jobs they don't...  Something like 1.5 million workers make under 4 euros an hour.  With the bottom level of wages reported being 55 cents.

 

and Unions don't keep factories in countries... it's quite the opposite.

What keeps union style jobs in a country is a general populace that wants the existence of good union jobs more then they want cheap goods.  That or cases like germany where they augment things where you basically don't need a minimium wage, and the good union jobs are supported by cheap non union jobs.


Having no minium wage helps that because their is no "floor level" of success, meaning shitty jobs aren't seen as real jobs.





By the way... best reason to RAISE the Minimum Wage is one nobody is mentioning for some reason.


Welfare pays better then minimum wage.



Kasz216 said:
By the way... best reason to RAISE the Minimum Wage is one nobody is mentioning for some reason.


Welfare pays better then minimum wage.

To paraphrase the late great Tupac Shakur, that's "The realist shit you ever wrote!"



Around the Network
spurgeonryan said:
Tthis is the point of miimum wage. Why even have it if no one follows it? This is basically saying no one should wwor hard, no one should go to school, no experience either. Just go get a job out of high school making what some make with school. Work hard and show what you are worth. If you do well you usually get a raise 90 days in and every year. If you do not work hard it will be less or you will be fired.

Plus if all minimum wage was raised to 16 dollars plus, just know that everyone will get this. Other people will not sit back while fast food employees make double what they do.

This means prices everywhere will go up. Good by dollar stores, walmart cheap pries, etc.

Bunch of idiots. Worthless!k


There is another part to that, if everyone makes more, all prices go up, everything costs more and what you make is now worth less, so that raise you wanted, your back to square one and you drove inflation through the roof.



Kasz raises an important point: people on minimum wage still need state assistance, or would rather get welfare because you can get more.

Granted, the likely argument to come from the Right on that is that welfare should simply pay less.



Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.

the2real4mafol said:
Maynard_Tool said:
If they want more money, they should prepare themselves to get a better job. Is minimum wage for a reason. They dont deserve a penny more thanthey get

You should really have to live in there shoes for a day to see how tough it is for the poor.

All this talk of opportunity and yet for some people they are locked out of all this because they can't afford it. I don't know how the poor can be lazy when it's usually the bosses who work less days overall. 

And also, unless you have been living under a rock since 2008, most jobs are either low skill or high skill. How do you suggest people to do better if there are few decent jobs now? especially if they can't afford university? As others said, the middle class is slowly disappearing as the poor get poorer and the rich get richer, that ain't good for a developed society.   

No, actually since 2008 ive been studying, completing my career and preparing myself,to get the job ive always dreamed on. Thats why I advice people to do....



I worked starting at the age of 16, first washing airplanes at the local regional airport ($6 an hour, hours under planes in 100+ degree heat) then as a dish washer ($7 an hour after school until midnight every day of the week, one time I did 2 full months without a single day off) to save up so that I could go to college. In college I worked at GeekSquad/BestBuy (started at $10 ended at about $13) until I graduated and started looking for a job it took me over a year to find a decent job in my field but I worked hard and eventually found a job with a local school system in Technology Support (salary job but it works out to about $17 an hour) and then after two years I got a promotion into the position I make now.

I look around and realize I didn't have anything anyone else doesn't have, I worked my way up from nothing (and plan to continue to work my way up) but I also didn't live beyond my means, when I was in school I didn't own a flat screen TV and my car was used, I still had a flip phone until like 2008 and thank god the Wii was only $250.

Today I still have to be frugal with my money, I still rent because I'm not quite stable enough to purchase a home yet, I still shop at the discount groccery store or Walmart and I still don't buy every little thing I would like because I have financial goals (I have an iPhone 4 for instance with no plans to upgrade until it stops working).

I think the main problem here and in society as a whole is they expect things to be handed to them, that they should be able to get a job straight out of high school with no experience and no skills and be able to buy fancy phones and computers and cars and whatnot is ridiculous. My parents are no rich but they are also no poor (I'd say slightly upper middle class) but they didn't give me a thing, I worked and continue to work for it despite the disadvantage I have (an actual one instead of self-imposed ones a lot of people claim)

A great example is my sister, she grew up in the exact same household as me, with the exact same advantages as me with two key differences 1) she does not have the health problems I have and 2) she has a much better personality (people skills, etc.) plus she's quite attractive physically (objectively I am secure in saying this, I'm her brother but I'm not blind). Yet she never finished school, is always in some sort of legal and/or financial struggle, is now married to quite a savory character and has three children they can't afford. They get food stamps and some other government assistance and they are always complaining about how they shouldn't have to work as hard as they do to get by.

They have a flat screen TV, they both have smart phones and a laptop and satellite TV and internet and their oldest (4 year old) has a kindle fire.

It's late I'm rambling so I'll sum up:

People should live within their means, if they want more they need to work to increase their means not be given things for nothing. End of story.



Systems Currently Playing: WiiU, PS3, 3DS

Also Have: Atari 2600, NES, SNES, PS1, N64, PS2, Wii, GB, GBC, GBA, DSLite, DSi, Android (RazorMax), iPhone (4), iPad (2)

SSJGohan3972 said:
I worked starting at the age of 16, first washing airplanes at the local regional airport ($6 an hour, hours under planes in 100+ degree heat) then as a dish washer ($7 an hour after school until midnight every day of the week, one time I did 2 full months without a single day off) to save up so that I could go to college. In college I worked at GeekSquad/BestBuy (started at $10 ended at about $13) until I graduated and started looking for a job it took me over a year to find a decent job in my field but I worked hard and eventually found a job with a local school system in Technology Support (salary job but it works out to about $17 an hour) and then after two years I got a promotion into the position I make now.

I look around and realize I didn't have anything anyone else doesn't have, I worked my way up from nothing (and plan to continue to work my way up) but I also didn't live beyond my means, when I was in school I didn't own a flat screen TV and my car was used, I still had a flip phone until like 2008 and thank god the Wii was only $250.

Today I still have to be frugal with my money, I still rent because I'm not quite stable enough to purchase a home yet, I still shop at the discount groccery store or Walmart and I still don't buy every little thing I would like because I have financial goals (I have an iPhone 4 for instance with no plans to upgrade until it stops working).

I think the main problem here and in society as a whole is they expect things to be handed to them, that they should be able to get a job straight out of high school with no experience and no skills and be able to buy fancy phones and computers and cars and whatnot is ridiculous. My parents are no rich but they are also no poor (I'd say slightly upper middle class) but they didn't give me a thing, I worked and continue to work for it despite the disadvantage I have (an actual one instead of self-imposed ones a lot of people claim)

A great example is my sister, she grew up in the exact same household as me, with the exact same advantages as me with two key differences 1) she does not have the health problems I have and 2) she has a much better personality (people skills, etc.) plus she's quite attractive physically (objectively I am secure in saying this, I'm her brother but I'm not blind). Yet she never finished school, is always in some sort of legal and/or financial struggle, is now married to quite a savory character and has three children they can't afford. They get food stamps and some other government assistance and they are always complaining about how they shouldn't have to work as hard as they do to get by.

They have a flat screen TV, they both have smart phones and a laptop and satellite TV and internet and their oldest (4 year old) has a kindle fire.

It's late I'm rambling so I'll sum up:

People should live within their means, if they want more they need to work to increase their means not be given things for nothing. End of story.

Thaaaaaank you. This, is what I was talking about.@bolded, thats the American Life. Spend more than you have/earn. Not saying every american, but thats the overall lifestyle.