What a game!!!! The 1st reason i got my vita. Ps plus+vita = totally worth it!

Gamers logic:
1) the vita is failing. No 3rd party will invest money in it (they'd be crazy to do so).
2) OMG! 3rd parties are stupid. Why don't they make games for WiiU?

And my favourite:
3) Vita has no games.
-Indies? They don't count.
-Uncharted: GA? I can play that on my ps3.
-Rayman Origins and Legends? Meh, multiplat, doesn't count (if it's multiplat, you're clearly not allowed to have fun playing it).
-Persona 4 Golden? Meh, port (because everyone and their mothers played the original and they can buy the ps2 version if they want to, since everyone is using their ps2)
-Gravity Rush, Soul Sacrifice? Meh, they didn't boost hardware at all (as if that has to do anything with their quality or budget).

Just because the vita is failing, doesn't mean it's not a good console or that it doesn't have great games. It means that the general public doesn't have an interest in it for several reasons. Sure, a gow, gta, grand turismo, red dead, bioshock, monster hunter game would help, but not necessarily because of quality, but because of the name itself and its brand power.

I wish people will come out and say, "you know what? I have no interest in vita, I will never buy it, no matter what is released, I could not care less as long as I see it failing." Because this is precisely how they feel and it shows. So, the next time you're about to say it has no games, either do some research or at least say that it doesn't have any games that interest you. Quality needs to stay out of the discussion, because you clearly have not played Soul Sacrifice or Gravity Rush and it's beyond silly saying that Pokemon is better, thus comparing a game which you haven't personally experienced with one that hasn't even been released.

(nothing personal against you, t-bone, though I do disagree with some of your arguments)

Are you sure you have enough qualifiers there? Maybe you should add a couple more just to be safe.

Well, the same criteria is usually applied to judging WiiU-games, so it isn't completely unfair. And you can reduce it to exclusives and still can name a lot of quality games on the 3DS.

how does the Vita's library compare to it's competitor, the 3DS?

Muramasa and Persona 4 are ports for crying out loud.

You know, it's on 3DS too. The predecessor (999) was only on DS (and therefore is playable on 3DS). Just saying.

1: I never mentioned the Wii-U: with that said I also think it's unfair there as well.

2: Whilts "quality" is subjective, I can argue Same with the Vita, you just have to know where to look...just like on any console out there. But as always it seems people are unwilling to take more than a second to look before passing judgement.

Gamers logic:
1) the vita is failing. No 3rd party will invest money in it (they'd be crazy to do so).
2) OMG! 3rd parties are stupid. Why don't they make games for WiiU?

And my favourite:
3) Vita has no games.
-Indies? They don't count.
-Uncharted: GA? I can play that on my ps3.
-Rayman Origins and Legends? Meh, multiplat, doesn't count (if it's multiplat, you're clearly not allowed to have fun playing it).
-Persona 4 Golden? Meh, port (because everyone and their mothers played the original and they can buy the ps2 version if they want to, since everyone is using their ps2)
-Gravity Rush, Soul Sacrifice? Meh, they didn't boost hardware at all (as if that has to do anything with their quality or budget).

Just because the vita is failing, doesn't mean it's not a good console or that it doesn't have great games. It means that the general public doesn't have an interest in it for several reasons. Sure, a gow, gta, grand turismo, red dead, bioshock, monster hunter game would help, but not necessarily because of quality, but because of the name itself and its brand power.

I wish people will come out and say, "you know what? I have no interest in vita, I will never buy it, no matter what is released, I could not care less as long as I see it failing." Because this is precisely how they feel and it shows. So, the next time you're about to say it has no games, either do some research or at least say that it doesn't have any games that interest you. Quality needs to stay out of the discussion, because you clearly have not played Soul Sacrifice or Gravity Rush and it's beyond silly saying that Pokemon is better, thus comparing a game which you haven't personally experienced with one that hasn't even been released.

(nothing personal against you, t-bone, though I do disagree with some of your arguments)