??? You asked the questions, and I answered them. How is that me changing the subject?

 No, the GC was simply more powerful than the ps2.

but yea, devs cant push BOTH machines on multiplatform games. Its not economical. 

I still refuse to believe that the Gamecube was more powerful.

No GC game could match God of War 2 or Shadow of the Colossus.

Results are more important than numbers. I felt the same about the PS3 until Uncharted came out. Looks better than any 360 game I've seen/own.

 Thats exactly how i feel but sadly ive looked up comparisons on the tech specs for the GC and the PS2 and apperantly it is, but even with less power the PS2 generated some amazing exclusive games that do look beter that most if not all GC games. And yes the same thing for the PS3 and the 360. but i once again feel the need to explain that this is only my oppinion.

Well, obviously you refuse to believe so, because you're a Sony fan.

Seriously, Shadow of the Colossus? The game with the jaggies that make bleed your eyes? The game with the horrible framerate? The game with huge amount of pop-up? And God of War 2 with it's blurry textures and simply modelled characters? I mean, they look good for PS2 games, but they have nothing to the likes of Star Fox Adventures, Resident Evil 4, Rogue Squadrons, etc., I won't get into technical details again because it seems it's useless.

The tangible and very visible difference in quality and visuals between multiplat titles and exclusive titles should yield much in the way of the answer you're searching for. And kudos for being open to suggestion or correction without being a bitch about it, many senior members could learn from you!

 well thats what im here for mostly lol beacuse i know that people on here know a S*** load more than i do so i can only go by what i see and read bout.

well the cube was just more powerful than the PS2. That's why re4 looks better on it (even tho it still looks like trash).

What you're saying is true. Especially this generation where really flushing out the capabilities of a machine takes a lot of time and resources.... time and resources 3rd party devs just arent willing to spend. Uncharted looks good because ND made it FOR ps3.

Heh guys, the PS3 is easier to develop for than was the case with regard to the PS2.

Porting games from 360 to PS3 can be unnecessary hard, the 360 dev tools are easy to get into, but also doesn't really force devs into thinking on getting the most out of the console (some good design principles are crucial for the PS3, but not so much on the 360 although devs will see gains on this console as well if their game engine is properly built).

Competent devs will have no trouble developing for the PS3 and will be able to yield much greater results than would be possible on the 360. Read my sig and click the link the linked thread explains a lot. The PS3's Cell is a radically different compared to prior approaches, so there's a learning curve, but it's not hard to develop for once you get the hang of it. It takes time and effort to adapt legacy game engines though.

IMO be glad devs interested in the PS3 are forced into good game engine design, this will result into more efficiently designed 360 and multi-core PC games as well.