Doesn't change the fact that he said 60fps should be standard for a FPS and then listed Battlefield 4 for PC being 60fps as he knows the console versions aren't.

Also love how you cherry picked all the bad things about out of the article, but a game likeInfamous Second Son got nothing but praise being one of the best looking games, with no frame drops or pop in that they saw at the demo.

Conegamer said: Nobody is interested because it isn't all positive. Negative Nintendo news and positive Sony news always get the most posts Hopefully the games will be somewhat more next-gen come launch.

Nobody is interested because it has nothing to do with anything. This isn't negative news. 1080/30fps is a design decision that showcases a consoles graphics. It's not like PS4 can't do 1080p/60FPS is thats what you or some other people think.

Forza 5 is the only game confirmed to be running at 1080p/60. So is Gran Turismo 5. So yeah, its a design decision. Forza 5 still doesn't have weather effects from what I hear. You sacrifice one thing for another. That's how game development works, especially in the rush of being ready for the launch of new consoles.

Yeah but that's not coming until next year. November 2014 I'd bet.

How much do you want to bet that Killzone SF will have better graphics than Halo Next?

60FPS didn't seem to matter to Halo fans before. Why is it so important now?

Well, I think the all-praised ps4-hardware raised expectations which this article counters. Games still look good but to me it's no news to say "everything looked great" when ps4 is set to dominate in every way imaginable.

And infamous? Wait, I saw something on GAF ... Oh yeah, that's it:

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=64821861&postcount=1113

VGKing said: Conegamer said: Nobody is interested because it isn't all positive. Negative Nintendo news and positive Sony news always get the most posts Hopefully the games will be somewhat more next-gen come launch. Nobody is interested because it has nothing to do with anything. This isn't negative news. 1080/30fps is a design decision that showcases a consoles graphics. It's not like PS4 can't do 1080p/60FPS is thats what you or some other people think.

Of course it can but then it will look worse.

Many gamers want to see a new level of graphics and many think 60 fps is part of it. Ask the ones who want 60 fps. And given ps4 has better hardware and killzone only renders in 30fps (with frame-hiccups by now) it *should* look better - everything else would be a shame.

Every game have their flaws... even so inFAMOUS together with The Division was the most impressives games at the show

60fps matters this Gen. If these consoles can't hit 1080p and 60fps for every game then they shouldn't have been released. Next Gen hasn't even started yet and compromises are already being made. We aren't talking about Halo on the 360. Its funny if any negative thing about Playstation is mentioned the Sony fans come to the rescue and defend it but they sure like to pile on when its Xbox related. You can dish it out bit you can't take it.

PS4 is more capable but GG wants to put more details at less frame rate which is good instead of going high frame rate with degraded details. They can push the game between 40-60 easily but but they want to keep the frame rate constant so for now they choose to stick at 30 and try to push this when the game is in beta.

Xbox is less capable than this and that Forza is said to be on 1080 60fps is becoz of cloud computing so we can't play that game without cloud computing at 60fps and also this game can't do weather and night effects which is a shame and its becoz of its less power than PS4.

And yes Battlefield is running at 60fps on PS4 and Xbox One. Looks like Killzone is the only shooter that isn't. If that was a design choice then it was a stupid one at that but keep defending it.