Yeah I noticed that too. Thinking about returning my copy. Oh wait, it still has a year left in development.

Pretty much expected. 1080p is going to be standard for next gen consoles with the 30/60 fps choice down to the devs. They can either go; 60 fps with similar graphics to higher-mid ranged PC graphics today, or 30 fps with more fidelity/effects in games.

Either way, I'm happy that they have the choice compared to this gen where the majority of games on PS3 or 360 are running at 720p/sub HD with frame rates 30 and under.

Why can't we be happy with that? Instead of trying to spin things around and make things sound more negative that than they are.. But really, if you don't find the PS4 launch software all that impressive then what chance does Xbox One have to offer to meet that expectation with weaker hardware? Honestly, if you care for graphics so much why not just go out there and buy a high end PC and put all these pissing contests to rest.

I'm seeing comments of graphics are more important than gameplay. Get a PC if you're a graphics whore. You honestly would rather play a clunky Killzone over a smooth experience because it may look a little better?

Yes, Halo can do only with cloud computing without that it can't do, but PS4 is more capable when the developers learn more about it which is good for offline console.

If the games plays better at 30fps with good detailing then we can feel it unlike PC games aren't purely developed on it becoz they are ports. GG knows and will make the game optimized for 30fps in PS4 unlike PC games which aren't optimized to get best gameplay out of it so we need to up framerate to get better gameplay.

I never said that Infamous didn't have any framerate issues or pop in, the things you're linking to on GAF I pointed them out myself in another thread.  I'm saying that Digital Foundry mentioned that they noticed no pop in and no frame drops in what they've watched.

Also the texture pop in segments are very few and the game was announced for 2014.

What I stated still stands.  Your posts cherry pick information so it's beneficial to you and your opinion. 

*edit*

I'll be sure to remember this, then throw it in your face when you sing praises of an Xbox One exclusive that only runs 30fps.

Got a link to the story of the PS4 running hot?

It is one my main concerns, why do you think MS went for the big box? They don't want to make the same mistake they did with the first X360. I really hope PS4 doesn't end up to noisy.

I'll wait for reviews with actual retail hardware and finished games. Until then I'll be playing GT6 at 60fps with weather and day/night cycle. Take that next-gen.

Few things:

1. Demos are just that, they are taken from the real game, but can be generally unpolished and are definitely unfinished. In fact any demos (from MS/Sony) could be a few weeks to a few months old. Working on demos for games is quite painful, so i can understand some demos having people standing with them while they play the games as EG pointed out. So much can go wrong with them if users go off the beaten track.
2. Some games are 4/5 months out. If the games are complete and all thats required is polish, then thats a hell of a lot of time to get the games into a better shape, as well as improve overall performance.
3. There is definitely a case for graphics over performance. If we take COD for example, they go for 60FPS, but it looks like crap. This is the choice you make, and in fact the choice is harder at the launch of a console, because you haven't necessarily improved your engines enough to try and do both. I've never had a problem with 30FPs on infamous. I would accept stable 30 and those graphics.
4. Picking Infamous/Driveclub as examples where there is pop-in/texture issues, these games are not due till next year, that is a very long time. The infamous gameplay video that was released, looks truly awesome and was definitely the best looking game of E3.