By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

 

VGKing said:

walsufnir said:
kupomogli said:
tuscaniman99 said:
This is exactly why I despise Killzone. Yeah its a great looking FPS, but that is all. The controls are terrible and 60fps should be the standard for a FPS. I don't want to hear "its supposed to feel that way and GG wanted 30fps." battlefield has heft to its guns and it runs at 60FPS+ (PC) and it is responsive. Being unresponsive and 30fps =/= heft.

So why is your avatar Master Chief from Halo?  None of the Halo games run at 60fps.


because there is no nextgen-halo. halo5 is said to be 60 fps,

Yeah but that's not coming until next year. November 2014 I'd bet.

How much do you want to bet that Killzone SF will have better graphics than Halo Next?

60FPS didn't seem to matter to Halo fans before. Why is it so important now?


Many gamers want to see a new level of graphics and many think 60 fps is part of it. Ask the ones who want 60 fps. And given ps4 has better hardware and killzone only renders in 30fps (with frame-hiccups by now) it *should* look better - everything else would be a shame.