I agree that I would love to have access to the new Xbox controller to play on my PC.

I don't mean a standard controller. That's just as pointless as the sixaxis. It's too poorly-balanced to even work well with tilt controls, forget gestures.

You need something well-balanced that allows freedom of motion. That's what Move and the Wiimote do, and I think both designs could be improved upon. 

Kinect could do a whole lot more with just one thumbstick and a couple buttons. On it's own I don't think it's much good except for dancing and boxing. It's frustrating to me because MS was committed enough to fix the range problem, the latency problem, jack the resolution, and make Kinect part of the core Xbox experience, but they couldn't quite push it all the way to designing a controller that would work harmoniously with it.

Read what you just posted, the only announced Forza as a quality exclusive title and possibly Quantum Break. Like i said the Kinect launch hade one 2 or 3 good titles, the rest of them were mediocre at best.

Now don't get me wrong, the release of a new console can't be compared with the release of an add-on. But stil i expect atleast 7 or 8 of those 15 titles to be Kinect focused, and even some of the most promising Kinect concepts like Star Wars Kinect were dissapointments.

Not that the PS4 has much more to show at the moment, but it's the throwing of numbers by Microsoft that's got me more worried than excited.

Your point is fair. That would have given more possibilities to The One. 

Still at least with being able to use the normal controller with Kinect will be more interesting to the core gamer as things like freedom for example could remain, but something like a battle in Ryse could require you to stand and fight in a one on one situation. Hopefully 1 -1 not like the terrible fight games Kinect 1 had. That Fighters Cage game sucked. So Bad. uuuuuhhhhhhhh.

I have more hope with Kinect 2.0. The lag in the video looked almost seemless. That alone will improve any experience ten fold. Hopefully devs will come up with good combination controls for games as all 3 are native to every purchase. Some games may utilize the tablet say for a spy game whilst using the controller for movement etc, whilst having Heavy Rain type segments with Kinect. I dont know, just throwing out there that devs can start to brainstorm. :)

I'm not sure what you are trying to say lol

I take it as you can either use a controller by it's self or you have the option to use both, or lastly you have the option to play it with kinect only.  Example being Killer Instict.  You can either use a controller only.  Or you could use kinect only. 

I liked the multitasking, I liked the controller, I liked Kinect, looks next gen.

The Cloud Integration could be awesome. Im very excited to hear more.

I really don't see how being concerned over something can be seen as an insult. We all know that Microsoft saved the game announcements for E3, wich is a understandable decision. However them shouting out ''it will have 15 exclusives at launch'' brought an instant flashback to the Kinect launch.(wich i bought by the way). I don't think it's a good move to show off with a big number and don't show the corresponding titles at the same time. It can can give off the impression that the quantity is worth showing more than the quality.

I'm still hoping Rare will come out with something amazing, and the new functions of Kinect give hope off a more engaging motion controll game experience. That and the fact that every Xbox One console will ship with one will mean developers are more likely to use atleast some of the functionality in their games.

"But perhaps the most curious thing about the Xbox One reveal was the manner in which Microsoft's engineers - and Turn 10's Dan Greenawalt - referred to both "transistors in the box", and "transistors in the cloud", the inference being that Xbox One could evolve by offloading mathematical computations from the local hardware to the ginormous servers Microsoft is prepping for the new system's launch. There was talk of new worlds being generated in the cloud, and less latency-specific systems like physics and AI being processed outside of the console. It's true that this is an exciting prospect in terms of creating massively multiplayer open worlds where "next-gen" dedicated servers will be required to keep track of everything that's going on and feed that out to the gamers.

However, even the 20-30ms latency we tend to see on the raw exchange of data over the internet is an absolute lifetime in terms of rendering games locally, plus of course there's the fact that any game embracing this won't work unless your internet connection is always on. We're certainly curious about how this particular facet of Xbox One gaming will evolve in the long term, but we weren't particularly convinced by the ideas set out by the panel - many which came across somewhat as wishful thinking thrown out there with no real exploration or real-life applications."