By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General Discussion - 12 People Shot at Mother's Day Parade in New Orleans.

chapset said:
Zappykins said:
chapset said:
An other case were a good guy with a gun could have saved the day

Please tell me you are joking.

Because he shoots somebody, somebody shoots him, then another person shoots that person.

are you an Obama voter, if you are you wouldn't understand, how us real manly mens take care of business, the cops are never going to be in plce when shit go down, they only get there when it's to late so it's your duty to protect yourself and your fellow muricans. Freedom!!!

Aha, I knew it.

Anyway, you were right to report me....so long as your report reason was "for breaking my heart". I will never forget your humor again, friend.



Around the Network
chapset said:
Zappykins said:
chapset said:
Zappykins said:
chapset said:
An other case were a good guy with a gun could have saved the day

Please tell me you are joking.

Because he shoots somebody, somebody shoots him, then another person shoots that person.

are you an Obama voter, if you are you wouldn't understand, how us real manly mens take care of business, the cops are never going to be in plce when shit go down, they only get there when it's to late so it's your duty to protect yourself and your fellow muricans. Freedom!!!

Ooooh, now you are trying to attack me personaly over your own assumptions?

At least you could try to be interesting, just another feeble troll from 'Meruca.

Seriously, your going to get banned soon anyway, might as well go down in flames.

banned for what?? did I hurt your feelings?? If I did I'm sorry honey and I send you many kisses

Oh please, you lack the fortitude, intelligence and creativity to insult me.  I mealy pointed out the complete fail of your logic and you lack of realizing the consequences.  I even gave you the benefit of the doubt and a way out.

And you seem to attempt to insult me by saying I don’t live up to your delusional nostalgic fantasies.  All that was missing was the ‘what I did to your mom’ lameness.

How about you find another place to annoy people or get some therapy so you might actually grow up and be a productive member of society?  I assume you are still breathing, might not be completely hopeless.  Or a job, do they have those where you live?

Or at least get a joke book.  Insults that are at least good stolen material can be rather funny. 



 

Really not sure I see any point of Consol over PC's since Kinect, Wii and other alternative ways to play have been abandoned. 

Top 50 'most fun' game list coming soon!

 

Tell me a funny joke!

Zappykins said:
chapset said:
Zappykins said:
chapset said:
Zappykins said:
chapset said:
An other case were a good guy with a gun could have saved the day

Please tell me you are joking.

Because he shoots somebody, somebody shoots him, then another person shoots that person.

are you an Obama voter, if you are you wouldn't understand, how us real manly mens take care of business, the cops are never going to be in plce when shit go down, they only get there when it's to late so it's your duty to protect yourself and your fellow muricans. Freedom!!!

Ooooh, now you are trying to attack me personaly over your own assumptions?

At least you could try to be interesting, just another feeble troll from 'Meruca.

Seriously, your going to get banned soon anyway, might as well go down in flames.

banned for what?? did I hurt your feelings?? If I did I'm sorry honey and I send you many kisses

Oh please, you lack the fortitude, intelligence and creativity to insult me.  I mealy pointed out the complete fail of your logic and you lack of realizing the consequences.  I even gave you the benefit of the doubt and a way out.

And you seem to attempt to insult me by saying I don’t live up to your delusional nostalgic fantasies.  All that was missing was the ‘what I did to your mom’ lameness.

How about you find another place to annoy people or get some therapy so you might actually grow up and be a productive member of society?  I assume you are still breathing, might not be completely hopeless.  Or a job, do they have those where you live?

Or at least get a joke book.  Insults that are at least good stolen material can be rather funny. 

 

You won, your superiority is apparant, you are now the new champion of the Internet click the link below to get your prize

(Edit: Offesive Link)

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_0sWspe4wPCY/SzSQq0bZIkI/AAAAAAAAAc4/x8fuZo0JFWQ/s1600/japan3.jpg

 

Mod Edit: Yeah... sarcasm or not in the other posts in this thread... just no.

Kasz216



Bet reminder: I bet with Tboned51 that Splatoon won't reach the 1 million shipped mark by the end of 2015. I win if he loses and I lose if I lost.

Government at its best!



well the proof is in the pudding.

Australia no mass shootings since 1996.

Doesn't take a genius to figure out why...



 

 

Around the Network
Zappykins said:
chapset said:
Zappykins said:
chapset said:
An other case were a good guy with a gun could have saved the day

Please tell me you are joking.

Because he shoots somebody, somebody shoots him, then another person shoots that person.

are you an Obama voter, if you are you wouldn't understand, how us real manly mens take care of business, the cops are never going to be in plce when shit go down, they only get there when it's to late so it's your duty to protect yourself and your fellow muricans. Freedom!!!

Ooooh, now you are trying to attack me personaly over your own assumptions?

At least you could try to be interesting, just another feeble troll from 'Meruca.

Seriously, your going to get banned soon anyway, might as well go down in flames.

Why would they get banned? Nothing in that statement is ban worthy. But I guess to different people it might be. 



curl-6 said:
Rpruett said:
curl-6 said:
Dunno if Americans are vastly psychologically/culturally different, but since strict gun control was introduced here in Australia in 1996, (including a ban on semi-auto rifles and shotguns, and restrictive ownership and licensing rules) we haven't had a single mass shooting. Not one, in 17 years. (In the 18 years before the legislation, we had 13 mass shootings, about one every 15 months)


That's fine and good, but Austrailia lives under a complete nanny state.   The banning of video games and forms of entertainment **for your own good**  rivals that of the UAE and Communist China.   We may never agree on this point, but I believe that this censorship is crazy and I think a healthy percentage of Americans would fall in line with that.

I don't want some politician or person in a position of power to decide, what I can and cannot see.  How is that anybodies right?  

It's not even in the same league as UAE or Communist China. I legally can walk down the street and buy God of War 3 or Hitman Absolution, or walk into Club X and buy a X-rated porno if I want to.

Could it be better? Yeah. But UAE and China are a world away. For instance, here I can write "Julia Gillard  (Our PM) is the devil" online and not worry about the cops banging down my door and sending me to a forced labor camp.

Censorship isn't entirely bad; shouldn't things like child pornography or a filmed rape be suppressed?

I disagree with it as a whole.  The problem is always  where does it stop and who decides when enough is enough?  Not you. Not your friends.  Some grey beard in a position higher than you.  This type of control always increases and never decreases.  That's the problem.   It then delves into the level of absurdity that protects nobody.

For example  : " Starting in January 2010, customs officials have been directed by Australian federal government censors to confiscate any porn depicting female ejaculation. Such content has been deemed to be "golden showers" (an act of urinating on one's partner). However Fionna Patten, a spokesman for the Australian Sex Party has stated, "Female ejaculation has now been described in scientific literature as being as real as male ejaculation and women's ejaculate is as different from urine, as men's is."[73]"

While I can agree,  Child pornography and/or filmed rape should be stopped, isn't there already laws in place for entities like that?   Why then is there any need for more censorship,  simply enforcement of existing laws.  Why the need for additional censorship and 'protection'.   It's an ever-increasing version of a nanny state.

I think that would quantify a major difference with the United States and the general publics viewpoint (Which has already far too much censorship for my tastes).  





Rpruett said:
curl-6 said:
Rpruett said:
curl-6 said:
Dunno if Americans are vastly psychologically/culturally different, but since strict gun control was introduced here in Australia in 1996, (including a ban on semi-auto rifles and shotguns, and restrictive ownership and licensing rules) we haven't had a single mass shooting. Not one, in 17 years. (In the 18 years before the legislation, we had 13 mass shootings, about one every 15 months)


That's fine and good, but Austrailia lives under a complete nanny state.   The banning of video games and forms of entertainment **for your own good**  rivals that of the UAE and Communist China.   We may never agree on this point, but I believe that this censorship is crazy and I think a healthy percentage of Americans would fall in line with that.

I don't want some politician or person in a position of power to decide, what I can and cannot see.  How is that anybodies right?  

It's not even in the same league as UAE or Communist China. I legally can walk down the street and buy God of War 3 or Hitman Absolution, or walk into Club X and buy a X-rated porno if I want to.

Could it be better? Yeah. But UAE and China are a world away. For instance, here I can write "Julia Gillard  (Our PM) is the devil" online and not worry about the cops banging down my door and sending me to a forced labor camp.

Censorship isn't entirely bad; shouldn't things like child pornography or a filmed rape be suppressed?

I disagree with it as a whole.  The problem is always  where does it stop and who decides when enough is enough?  Not you. Not your friends.  Some grey beard in a position higher than you.  This type of control always increases and never decreases.  That's the problem.   It then delves into the level of absurdity that protects nobody.

For example  : " Starting in January 2010, customs officials have been directed by Australian federal government censors to confiscate any porn depicting female ejaculation. Such content has been deemed to be "golden showers" (an act of urinating on one's partner). However Fionna Patten, a spokesman for the Australian Sex Party has stated, "Female ejaculation has now been described in scientific literature as being as real as male ejaculation and women's ejaculate is as different from urine, as men's is."[73]"

While I can agree,  Child pornography and/or filmed rape should be stopped, isn't there already laws in place for entities like that?   Why then is there any need for more censorship,  simply enforcement of existing laws.  Why the need for additional censorship and 'protection'.   It's an ever-increasing version of a nanny state.

I think that would quantify a major difference with the United States and the general publics viewpoint (Which has already far too much censorship for my tastes).  

Not true; censorship recently decreased in regards to games here.



Luck said:
That would of never happened in the good old west, where everybody was too scared to attack each other. If only every citizen would train like Rambo and never leave home without a semi-auto. The Good ol' USA would be free and safe again.



It never wasn't safe... questionable on the free part though