WiiU is the top one, right? That's not too bad actually...
1- lets wait for the final product and reviews.
2- 14 FPS confirmed?
Edit: but IF its true, and the game will look far superior on the WiiU and it will have a stabil framerate, lets hope that the sales will be there, and that more companies will try to imitate Criterion 
Vote the Mayor for Mayor!
If that is representative of the actual difference between the two games then colour me at least moderately impressed. My reservations are; the screen shots are from two different sources, there are only two of them and they do seem to be a different times of the day.
It seems on the face of it that Criterion has done the right thing development-wise and is now doing the right thing promotion-wise.
Unless it all falls apart with the reviews, I'm on board.
It's interesting to note that in this case nobody even mentions EA.
if this game looked worse on the Wii U everyone would be hating on them right now.
“It appeared that there had even been demonstrations to thank Big Brother for raising the chocolate ration to twenty grams a week. And only yesterday, he reflected, it had been announced that the ration was to be reduced to twenty grams a week. Was it possible that they could swallow that, after only twenty-four hours? Yes, they swallowed it.”
- George Orwell, ‘1984’
B-b-b-b-but... Wii U isn't as powerful as xbox!? whuaaawhuaaawhuaaaa
I'm on Twitter @DanneSandin!
Furthermore, I think VGChartz should add a "Like"-button.
Wow, that's actually a dramatic difference and more than I would expect from a port. I guess they used the PC version. It truly looks like a "generational leap" as people like to say. In the second set, the WiiU version almost looks like a photograph.
well, if the demo will be ok i can buy it...
GameSpot has better graphics than IGN confirmed!
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2024 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
