By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics - According to this bible Passage, End times will start in 2050

You can say anyone's mother is a whore, and you won't get arrested and I probably won't punch you in the face because I am civil. Otherwise, I would strap on a bomb and blow you up like an insane terrorist. Or shoot u up with AK47 in your local college/school.

That passage proofs nothing, it's just a big creature... Are you implying that a HUMAN has seen a LIVE dinosaur? you are crazy, they live millions of years apart based on carbon dating and earliest human remain fossil records. The bible may have meant something like this would be more believable:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mammoth

Which could have co-existed with earliest human ancestors.



Around the Network

And wait, why do you believe those passages again? We don't even know who the hell wrote it and yet we believe it as the truth yet again.



Anyways, i am signing out. I am just trying to say there are shit tons of ppl who does not give a shit about the Holy Bible because the stories in it is not believable and unreal by today's standard (scientific evidence and such). Ignore my comments and continue ur prior conversation...

This is almost like us on VGChartz arguing about sales, but we don't even know if the numbers are real and making predictions based on probably fake made up numbers as well. Which i find extremely hilarious. Peace out.



xwan said:
You can say anyone's mother is a whore, and you won't get arrested and I probably won't punch you in the face because I am civil. Otherwise, I would strap on a bomb and blow you up like an insane terrorist. Or shoot u up with AK47 in your local college/school.

That passage proofs nothing, it's just a big creature... Are you implying that a HUMAN has seen a LIVE dinosaur? you are crazy, they live millions of years apart based on carbon dating and earliest human remain fossil records. The bible may have meant something like this would be more believable:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mammoth

Which could have co-existed with earliest human ancestors.

So I'm crazy now? oO

Well, whether you react to "Your mother is a whore" or not, that doesn't change the fact that it's uncivil and insulting, and freedom of speech will never justify that in the eyes of an intelligent person. Make your own conclusions on what I mean by that.

As for it being a mammoth, you defo want it to not be a dinosaur. Since you're so lucid, mind explaining your bias? It clearly states that the thing preys on smaller creatures, I don't remember hearing that about Mammoths...

20 Surely the mountains bring him forth food, where all the beasts of the field play.

I also don't remember mammoths eating grass as an ox, since they have trunks they would eat grass like an elephant.

15 Behold now behemoth, which I made with thee; he eateth grass as an ox.

 

I don't remember Mammoths having tails like a cedar last time I checked.

17 He moveth his tail like a cedar: 

This does though


 

And yes, humans and dinos have co-existed, and we've also found fresh dino tissue very recently.



Just had to reply one last time, I am not sure why you are calling my mom a whore. I am just pointing out to you that I do not believe woman can give birth to a boy without getting inseminated with sperm; i used the layman's term of 'creampie'. It has nothing to do with Virgin Mary being a whore, it just has to do with the truth that I think she had sex with someone and gave birth to Jesus. How come only Bible people can believe that Virgin Mary is a Virgin but I cannot believe that she's not a Virgin? How is this civilized, being civilized means you can express whatever opinions you like and not get blown up in like you do in the Middle East. I am being intelligent because i have not seen or read about a single virgin birth in modern medicine.



Around the Network
xwan said:
Just had to reply one last time, I am not sure why you are calling my mom a whore. I am just pointing out to you that I do not believe woman can give birth to a boy without getting inseminated with sperm; i used the layman's term of 'creampie'. It has nothing to do with Virgin Mary being a whore, it just has to do with the truth that I think she had sex with someone and gave birth to Jesus. How come only Bible people can believe that Virgin Mary is a Virgin but I cannot believe that she's not a Virgin? How is this civilized, being civilized means you can express whatever opinions you like and not get blown up in like you do in the Middle East. I am being intelligent because i have not seen or read about a single virgin birth in modern medicine.

What you have not seen is not untrue or impossible. This is the same fallacy we had to go over in the other thread.

I never called your mom a whore... I was saying that using that statement would be uncivil.

You can't say whatever you want, if it's uncivil, it's uncivil. Whether you get bombed for it or not, it doesn't change the fact that it's uncivil.

You can believe whatever you want, but you should be careful how you say things so as to not offend. If we were talking about how you were born, and I said that your mom got creampied, that wouldn't be respectful.



I read that dinosaur tissue thing real quick; did u even read the freaking article? It doesn't say we co-existed it's a way they prepare the fossilized tissue that led to the discovery of preserved arteries and muscle tissues that has not mineralized in the fossil's interior... It doesn't proof anything, dont mislead ppl please. Earliest homo sapien records (molecular and fossils) is not even 5 million years old...(not to mention the invention of tools and writing and language)



you cant just extract a part from the bible and say the world will end then and then..Jesus said the day will come soon and only God knows when..if only God knows that means there is no clue whatsoever its no where writen.



Tsubasa Ozora

Keiner kann ihn bremsen, keiner macht ihm was vor. Immer der richtige Schuss, immer zur richtigen Zeit. Superfussball, Fairer Fussball. Er ist unser Torschützenkönig und Held.

xwan said:
I read that dinosaur tissue thing real quick; did u even read the freaking article? It doesn't say we co-existed it's a way they prepare the fossilized tissue that led to the discovery of preserved arteries and muscle tissues that has not mineralized in the fossil's interior... It doesn't proof anything, dont mislead ppl please. Earliest homo sapien records (molecular and fossils) is not even 5 million years old...(not to mention the invention of tools and writing and language)

I read the article a few times, and it doesn't matter how it's interpreted by people, the fact is that non-decomposed tissue has been found, and I didn't say anything false. The picture was taken as-is from the article.

I know what will be said about it, but the fact is that the tissue is not decomposed, so I have reason to believe that humans and dinos walked the earth together. The stories of dragons only amplifies this belief.



spurgeonryan said:
They were wrong. He has been right about a lot. What more can I say?

And that's why you always pray to Emmanuel Christ. Oh, wait.