We have 0 contempory evidence of Jesus. All accounts of this Messiah came 40+ years after his death as hearsay evidence. Astonishing when you consider that people only lived 29 years on average at that time period.

This is not a historical fact at all and pawning it off as one is completely fallacious. I realize that may be a shock to you, because of the misinformation spread of his existence, but I'm here to debunk that as what it is - nonsense.

The basis of your claim is based on the assertion that god exists, since you have made an incredible claim; please provide the proof for your claim.

I'd like to propose an idea, if 'God' is 'omnipotent' and created adam from dirt and eve from adams rib, then why not create Jesus in the same fashion?

There is no need for a human vessel, surely 'God' could have created Jesus as he did adam. The people of the time would have been shocked but pleased at the presence of their god, and yet this was not the case.

Side note:

I have no doubt that A Jesus did exist, so let’s propose this secondary idea, the Jesus of the bible was not 'Gods' son, nor was his conception anything different from any others in his time, he was just a normal man. A man with ideals, good ideals, such strong ideals that he voiced them in public. He's ideals conflicted with the king who ruled, so much so that he was cought and executed. his ideal while alive resinated with people and developed a following, when he died, he died for his ideals and became a martyr for them. Among his followers their resolve in his ideals was cemented and began to spread his ideals but in doing so the Jesus of the bible was created.

Now we know from History that folk stories have some times drifted from their origins making them seem more spectacular than they once were, it is a strong possibility that such a case could of happened with Jesus of the bible. So it would seem more logical for this to be true as there have been martyr's in modern time just as Jesus was in his. Rather than take a leap of faith and start talking about a supernatural being performing supernatural acts despite no such phenomena actually being observable in our modern societies. Keep in mind pretty much every civilian has recording devices in their phones. Kinda odd that more supernatural phenomena was happening so often back then , but now with the advent of recording technology this phenomena is almost non-existent, no matter how much people try.

Food for thought, so take it as you will :)

You're trying really hard to fill in the blanks. If god were all-powerful, he could've just as well created a world with free will and no evil. So he's not all powerful. (Of course, it's ridiculous that I should say this; after all, there is no god to begin with). "And the fact he created the very fabric of our existence tells us that he doesn't have to abide any laws from it." That's called begging the question. Needless to say, it's not a good argument. In fact, it's shameful to even consider that an argument.

And it's not like saying a machine made by man dictates the man's functions, not the other way around. It's like saying that a machine made by man must obey the laws of the physical world around it.

1. I'm a little confused is 'god' omnipotent or not?

If 'god' is omnipotent then he has absolute control over our free will, which means he also has control of good and evil however they came about. Also I thought the flood was meant to reset the world by wiping out all evil, in which case he tried to control our free will but clearly failed, which then leads to the question, if 'god' is not omnipotent, then what exactly are his capabilities, furthermore, this leads up to...is there any other 'god' who is more powerful than the god of the bible? I ask this because in the first two commandments, "1. I am the LORD thy God, 2. Thou shalt have no other god" This would of course imply there was at least another 'god' figure in the equation. Clearly 'god' establishing himself as lead of the 'club' was more important than "Thou shalt not kill" which was delegated to 7th spot on the 10 commandments, interesting that.

2. Again I'm a little confused is 'god' omniscient or not?

If 'god' is omniscient he would of already known that by creating man and giving them free will they would create evil, if this was the case and he was truly omniscient then he would of put previsions in place to avoid evil from being created which of course would mean a flood was not required to reset the world, but that's not what happened.  If 'god' is omniscient and saw everything that would happen including the need to flood the world but still went ahead despite what he already knows, would this not make 'god' incompetent or sadistic?, and if 'god' is NOT omniscient, then he would not have foreseen the events that would occur, which resulted in him trying flood the world to fix his mistake but ultimately failed, would this behaviour of trial and error suggest that 'god' is not perfect but prone to mistakes. Such a 'god' would be truly scary much more so than Iran or North Korea getting nukes.

I would suggest that ‘god’ is not sentient, rather the Universe is god, we can get rid of the term ‘god’ and simply say that the universe has provided the necessary materials for not only our galaxy to be created, but also our sun, our earth and the right elements for life. And when we die, we return back to our creator, the universe. This is why we do not observe supernatural phenomena as the universe its self follows a set guide line which is not supernatural, this has allowed physicist to create laws that follow their observations with predictive capabilities which inform us on how things can work. It’s an ever evolving field as we do not know how everything works in the cosmos nor does anyone studying those filed claim they do, and this is why these people are driven to discover the unknown, I guess we humans just have a thirst for knowledge.

Again, take my thoughts as you will :)

This reminds of a paradox of I read somewhere, it goes something like this….Can God make a rock so big He can't pick it up?

If 'god' can make a rock so big he can't lift it, then he's not omnipotent. If 'god' can make a rock so big and is able to lift, then he's not omnipotent. The key thing about this paradox is that it brings his omnipotence into question.

Lol yeah. See my post in another thread (http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=5066808) for a brief talk on these "omnipowers".

Wow, you sure are a waste of time.