By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
ultima on 28 January 2013
Edit Thread
Player1x3 said:
ultima said:
Player1x3 said:

I can see that the omniscient Creator of Universe definitely needed some ''tech''to impregnate a woman while keeping her virgin... it's not like he's God or anything...

 As for the highlighted part, that's exactly the reason why such comments shouldn't be made. But as long as despicable people exist, they unfortunately will be.

Well, that so called "omniscient Creator" couldn't apparently create a world without evil but with free will. So yeah, it looks like the so called "omniscient Creator" has to abide by laws of the world. And laws of the world state that for this Mary to get pregnant, she must've had a sperm penetrate her. The only way for her to have stayed a virgin during pregnancy is if she had someone jerk off on her private parts without penetrating her. Or something along those lines.

"Which is more likely: that the whole natural order is suspended or that a Jewish minx should tell a lie?" David Hume

God didn't create world with evil. Evil is absence of good, and that comes from human free will, which is 1 thing God doesn't have a control over. Evil comes from humans, not God. And the fact he created the very fabric of our existence tells us that he doesn't have to abide any laws from it. That's like saying a machine made by man dictates the man's functions, not the other way around 

You're trying really hard to fill in the blanks. If god were all-powerful, he could've just as well created a world with free will and no evil. So he's not all powerful. (Of course, it's ridiculous that I should say this; after all, there is no god to begin with). "And the fact he created the very fabric of our existence tells us that he doesn't have to abide any laws from it." That's called begging the question. Needless to say, it's not a good argument. In fact, it's shameful to even consider that an argument.

And it's not like saying a machine made by man dictates the man's functions, not the other way around. It's like saying that a machine made by man must obey the laws of the physical world around it.