Wait... any other company would have fired their CEO by now, after Nintendo had ONE year of losses? Really?
Companies that have done far worse than Nintendo under a certain CEO have had the CEO stay on indefinitely with an increased bonus, and then given a golden parachute when they do leave. Why should Nintendo fire the CEO based on a single bad year that is 90% attributable to exchange rates, after said CEO took a massive pay cut in response? Especially when the same CEO was the one that orchestrated Nintendo's prior rise to heights never seen before?
I guess I just don't see how anybody could conclude that Nintendo's leadership is the problem.










