Aielyn on 08 January 2013
Wait... any other company would have fired their CEO by now, after Nintendo had ONE year of losses? Really?
Companies that have done far worse than Nintendo under a certain CEO have had the CEO stay on indefinitely with an increased bonus, and then given a golden parachute when they do leave. Why should Nintendo fire the CEO based on a single bad year that is 90% attributable to exchange rates, after said CEO took a massive pay cut in response? Especially when the same CEO was the one that orchestrated Nintendo's prior rise to heights never seen before?
I guess I just don't see how anybody could conclude that Nintendo's leadership is the problem.
