Yes I thought it was in order to get some laughs. Hope you laughed your ass off like I did the first time I seen it.

Atheists are usually regarded as politically left wing. Religious people are usually regarded as right wing. An argument between a religious and a non-religious person debating religion never ends well.

it did mate, it really did!!! 

If it isn't a testable hypothesis, no conclusions can be drawn. I do not accept anything without evidence. As has been shown to you several times now, the "God Particle" [fabricated media term] known to science as the Higgs Boson has been discovered.

You have admitted to being ignorant to even fundamental scientific discoveries meaning you have less knowledge on the subject matter than the rest of the people arguing with you. Authority issue or what? We're not lying in order to discredit you, we're basing our information on what has been theorized/observed/evidenced. Do you not understand this?

So you have not drawn any conclusions about God then or about the Bible, or have you?

Well this I would consider a religious debate, and while you have not admitted your ignorance to even fundamental religious discoveries meaning you have less knowledge on the subject matter than myself and the rest of the people arguing with you, you clearly are ignorant of Christian and other religious principles. Authority issue or what? We Christians are not lying in order to discredit or convince you or Science, we're basing our information on what has been theorized/observed/evidenced. Do you not understand this?

If he was also an anti theist, then yes, I would probably. So far, most if not all of them were, so yeah, theres a logical pathway

The Bible is a book of fables. It isnt' relevant in discussions of a supernatural being unless the only possibility you consider is that one described in the Bible?

As there is no evidence for the existence of God, I do not BELIEVE in his existence, but I cannot state that He does not exist. It is the same as you cannot state that He does. 

Your alteration to my statement is entirely ridiculous. Christians base nothing on theory/observation/evidence. They place the entirety of their religion in a book. 

I hope you understand the difference, but I doubt you're capable of such trivialities.

What sounds like a fable is this theory of a universe is expanding into nothingness with a bunch of other universes, because of some theoritical light that purportedly has all the answers to existance - really? ha ha

But you can BELIEVE what you want to, I will do as well.

Your statement was highly rediculous in the first place so I agree, as it I proved nothing. Christians do based their whole existance on theory/observation/evidence, over many generations culminated in a single book. However, you do not put christianity or religion in lab and bounce light off of it and expect to see Jesus - I think that is your problem. You seem to think that only Scientist can Thoerise, Observe, and put forward Eveidence, which shows you closeminded view of anything outside of Science.

See my friend your problem is that you cannot hold on to Christianity put it in a lab, disect or bounce lights off to see what effect it has. Maybe you really should have taken some religious classes, cause Science has made your thinking biased and onesided.

Well, science isn't based upon belief. It's based upon observation and evidence. 

Christianity is based upon a book. Like I said. It offers nothing new. Ever. It's never adapted, never amended, and not something anyone takes literally. So how can you use it as a reference at all if it isn't literal? You can't.

You don't seem to understand the difference between belief and evidence. Perhaps find a dictionary?

As to my point, you aren't educated. You have a distinct lack of education that you admit in basic physics and biology which are vital to explaining certain scientific discoveries that refute many of Christianity's teachings entirely. 

If there is a logical pathway from atheism that leads to killing people, could you please explain it.