kowenicki said:
ethomaz said:
|
kowenicki said:
and again you miss the ludicrous nature of the point you made.
By your logic, no halo game since Halo CE has ever cost money, because the previous game in the series made easily enough to cover the making of the next iteration.
THINK!
|
No. Halo 3 is a new production... Halo: Reach even... Halo 4 again.
GT5:P just exists to tests the new engine and features for GT5... in fact they are the same game interaction... one don't exists without the other... it's more like Halo 3 to ODST... there is no OSDT without Halo 3.
It's the same team... same development... same engine.
|
and now you beat your own arguement.
But to humour you...
So halo 2 cost nothng (halo CE engine)
and halo ODST cost nothing as it was Halo 3 engine?
Its barmy logic.
|
its not quit the same as GT5 and GT5 prologue shared their development costs. and GT5p was esentially and demo or beta of the full GT5. GT5p was a work in progress GT5.
GT5 prologue was how much progress they had made on the game at the time of its release, and GT5 was progress complete.
it would be akin to if Halo 4 released of half finished version of its self last year. and sold it for ~$30. there wouldnt be 2 seperate development cost associated with Halo 4: prologue and Halo 4.