or they just dont like pokemons?
I agree with rol's statement, regardless of not having paid attention to the videogaming market at the time when it happened. I hate talking about "hardcore" and "casual" games because I enjoy both. I hardly see the difference between the games in terms of what kind of enjoyment they give to me. Just because I enjoy a casual game doesn't make me a kiddy gamer with immature tastes. I feel the same enjoyment from both casual and hardcore games, the rift between the two is as imaginary as the rift between whether races exist biologically (and they don't within humans).
Immortal said:
The only ones I conceded were the sports/racing games. I mean, I don't think you even have shoot 'em ups nowdays. Or if they're necessarily "core". For niche games, I just said I've never heard of them so I really can't agree whether or not you're using the right examples. Since the concept didn't exist ten years ago, it can't apply to games released then. I dare you to find a single publication that uses the term "hardcore gamer" before this generation. In another ten years, the concept won't exist anymore so it won't matter. Does my definition for Yugoslavian not work because it doesn't mean anything today? Also, you have to find not a 12-rated game (which I said was ambiguous), but a 16 or 18-rated game that we all agree is casual, which you still haven't done. And of course core franchises get a free pass. A God of War cooking game would be very hardcore. |
Great. Now games are hardcore based on the franchise name. Things keep getting better and better. And know what? you really have to do it, otherwise this would be a casual game:

I think nothing more needs to be said.