By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - I've discovered that Pokemon is a Hardcore Game, therefore Pokemon Haters must be Casual Gamers (and a few Mid-core).

the_dengle said:
Player2 said:

A casual gamer is a player whose time or interest in playing games is limited. Casual gamers tend to play games designed for ease of gameplay and don't spend much time playing more involved games. The genres that casual gamers play vary, and they might not own a specific video game console to play their games. (...)(more demographic stuff).

That's funny, I don't see anything there defining casual gamers as people who dislike a single arbitrary example of a hardcore game.

I'm not saying that every casual gamer is a hater. There are pokemon haters (there is no doubt in that) and what I'm trying to do is to find the type of gamer they are. Since pokemon fails as a casual game (see below the part you quoted) the most logical answer is that pokemon haters belong to the casual gamer group.



Around the Network

That definition is nonsense.
Any game rated above T/12 is hardcore and any game rated below is casual (i.e. for kiddies and soccer moms). Games rated T/12 vary in hardcoreness. With some evident exceptions, this definition always works. Pokemon is not one of these exceptions; it is evidently for kiddies.



 

“These are my principles; if you don’t like them, I have others.” – Groucho Marx

Immortal said:
That definition is nonsense.
Any game rated above T/12 is hardcore and any game rated below is casual (i.e. for kiddies and soccer moms). Games rated T/12 vary in hardcoreness. With some evident exceptions, this definition always works. Pokemon is not one of these exceptions; it is evidently for kiddies.

Should I trust a forum user instead of the Wikipedia then? Notice that by your definition Civilization, Gran Turismo and Minecraft (for example) are for soccer moms.



Player2 said:
the_dengle said:
Player2 said:

A casual gamer is a player whose time or interest in playing games is limited. Casual gamers tend to play games designed for ease of gameplay and don't spend much time playing more involved games. The genres that casual gamers play vary, and they might not own a specific video game console to play their games. (...)(more demographic stuff).

That's funny, I don't see anything there defining casual gamers as people who dislike a single arbitrary example of a hardcore game.

I'm not saying that every casual gamer is a hater. There are pokemon haters (there is no doubt in that) and what I'm trying to do is to find the type of gamer they are. Since pokemon fails as a casual game (see below the part you quoted) the most logical answer is that pokemon haters belong to the casual gamer group.

Read what I said again. I'm saying being a Pokémon hater doesn't make you a casual gamer. It's just one example of a "hardcore" game. Suppose we choose another equally "hardcore" game, like Mass Effect. What if someone is super hardcore for Mass Effect but simply doesn't like Pokémon, or vice-versa? Just because they don't like Pokémon, they're casual? Does this rule apply exclusively to Pokémon and to no other games?



pezus said:
Pokemon is pretty hardcore, but that does not mean some hardcore gamers can't hate it. After all, hardcore gamers don't want to play every single hardcore game that's out there if they don't *like* the game. It's not about being a hardcore gamer or not, it's about liking the game.

But hating a game just because it is different is quite stupid. Imagine that every company made only shooters (or the genre you prefer). Then if the shooter userbase isn't big enough the entire industry would collapse. Diversity is absolutely needed. Do you think we have enough people that doesn't realize this?



Around the Network
the_dengle said:
Player2 said:
the_dengle said:
Player2 said:

A casual gamer is a player whose time or interest in playing games is limited. Casual gamers tend to play games designed for ease of gameplay and don't spend much time playing more involved games. The genres that casual gamers play vary, and they might not own a specific video game console to play their games. (...)(more demographic stuff).

That's funny, I don't see anything there defining casual gamers as people who dislike a single arbitrary example of a hardcore game.

I'm not saying that every casual gamer is a hater. There are pokemon haters (there is no doubt in that) and what I'm trying to do is to find the type of gamer they are. Since pokemon fails as a casual game (see below the part you quoted) the most logical answer is that pokemon haters belong to the casual gamer group.

Read what I said again. I'm saying being a Pokémon hater doesn't make you a casual gamer. It's just one example of a "hardcore" game. Suppose we choose another equally "hardcore" game, like Mass Effect. What if someone is super hardcore for Mass Effect but simply doesn't like Pokémon, or vice-versa? Just because they don't like Pokémon, they're casual? Does this rule apply exclusively to Pokémon and to no other games?

Don't mix don't like and hate. I don't like FPS games but I don't hate them. It's just that they aren't my thing. However, I know that they have a reason to exist because other people like them. Nobody likes everything.



pezus said:

I don't know where you see all those Pokemon haters. To me most people seem to love Pokemon (or have loved at some point). Not everyone is going to like this game, just like not everyone likes CoD or Uncharted and so on. I like pokemon myself, but the years of childhood I lost playing the games is enough for me ;o

Spain is Sonyland so maybe I see them more frequently.



It CAN be hardcore, but I remember being 11 years old when Pokemon red and blue came out when pokemon took off.

You cant say a game is truly core when pre teens are the main players.



Xbox: Best hardware, Game Pass best value, best BC, more 1st party genres and multiplayer titles. 

 

Player2 said:
pezus said:
Pokemon is pretty hardcore, but that does not mean some hardcore gamers can't hate it. After all, hardcore gamers don't want to play every single hardcore game that's out there if they don't *like* the game. It's not about being a hardcore gamer or not, it's about liking the game.

But hating a game just because it is different is quite stupid. Imagine that every company made only shooters (or the genre you prefer). Then if the shooter userbase isn't big enough the entire industry would collapse. Diversity is absolutely needed. Do you think we have enough people that doesn't realize this?


Yeah, I find it very stupid when people hate on shooters. You are absolutely on the point.



Since when was Pokemon not a hardcore game? Just because it appeals to the mass?