We have always had good rules, we just need good enforcers.

I advocated for something more vague.

Generally, without a guideline, we tend to step back on immediate moderations (except on the "GIFs in sigs" thing. The rules there remain clear) and instead issue advisories.

Fair enough. Can I still blame spurgeonryan for that blemish to my perfect moderation history?

Im wondering, would I be considered a new user even though I've been on this site for about 2 years.

No IBTL posts? Lame. That was my favourite thing to do on the WoW forums :(

I think "New Users" is the wrong wording for that... rather think of it as "Non-established users".

For example, I've had an account for four years now at NeoGAF, yet I only have one post () to my name over there. I'm still considered a "Junior Member". Same thing here. We'll view established posters differently than non-established ones, mainly due to their posting history.

Hope that clears any confusion you have.

In my eyes, yes - the rule was based around post content, so it's quite irrelevent when you joined - rather about how often you've posted

As a frequent breaker of all rules in my past. (Longest mod history evar ) I feel that I can help you with sig length.

In a one line post, your sig must not pass the box in which your avatar, post count, badges and recent games sits.

Come on mods, you know Im right.

Carl2291 said: As a frequent breaker of all rules in my past. (Longest mod history evar ) I feel that I can help you with sig length. In a one line post, your sig must not pass the box in which your avatar, post count, badges and recent games sits. Come on mods, you know Im right.

I haven't broken your mod history record? Noooooooooooo!!!!!!