Honestly, for Romney to do a good job in my mind he's going to have to piss off a whole bunch of his voting base. But if he decides to go back to being more socially liberal and fix some of the issues we have on that end, then sure I'd vote for him in 4 years.

Make those applying for food stamps take a drug test and make anyone benefiting from said food stamps under that household take a drug test too.

The worst policies in human history IMO

So you're under the assumption that all people who are doing drugs that have food stamps and/or on some kind of welfare are abusing it?  I doubt it.  

It is the correct assumption due to the fact that it's completely obvious and the only reason to state it is to mean to throw people off of it.  There was no point in talking about it at all if you include "improving the economy."  It's especially obvious he meant that when the post he made was so short, it's really barely anything.

While I don't think drug tests on everyone on food stamps is an economically viable solution, I do think that if you're on food stamps, and are spending some of your money on drugs when you supposedly can't buy food I think you're by definition abusing the food stamps.  

Yes, saving the earth is worse than slavery, the Inquisition, the Holocaust, the Armenian Genocide, Stalin's 5-year plans, the Great Leap Forward, and the Crusades

Your opinion is wrong. You will retract that hyperbole now.

As opposed to like genocide or military imperialism?

Anyway, as for the OP, it would take more than an economic turn-around, which would probably have little to do with either president.  However, if Romney were to actually do a good job, and if he does not attempt to push across hard-line conservative social laws, then I would vote for him.  I think he's a moderate at heart in a lot of ways, anyway.

You know i was exaggerating. But i still think they're pretty bad. Especially on social issues

Hmm, maybe the worst after those 2