By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Puddle Runs At Full 1080p & 60 FPS On Wii U

pezus said:
lilbroex said:
pezus said:
lilbroex said:
pezus said:

Why? Since PS3 is the more powerful of the two, that's the one that Wii U should be compared to, is it not? In this thread you seem to be saying 1080p/60fps is some advantage the Wii U version has over the HD console version, and now that it isn't you've changed your argument.

Reread the post above. My argument hasn't channged at. In fact my specific argument was that it is superior because it is outputting at 1080p and its outputting at 60 FPS on 2 screens at once. I've restated this many times. You cannot deny that the Wii U verion will be technically and graphically better.

*sigh* Sure, that's what you did *rolls eyes*. That's why this thread has went on for 250 replies. *Rolls eyes again*


The thread has gone on so long because people don't want to acknolwedge that a Nintendo system has done something superior to their preferred companies hardware like always.

The thing I find the funniest, thought, that people do things exactly like that video I posted earlier. When a Wii U game is announced 1080p they go ON AND ON AND ON about how 1080p isn't important(oh i have a 720p T.V. so it means nothing to me) but the moment a game getting denounced as not 1080p they shift over to "haha, the Wii U is weak" compltely contradicting themselves.

Again making up facts. Who did that? You've got 5 minutes

Again, lying by saying I'm making up facts.


I got that "quote"(may not be words for word) from this very thread. You can look it up yourself. I'm not calling out any names but I wonder what fish tacos taste like.



Around the Network
Andrespetmonkey said:
lilbroex said:
Andrespetmonkey said:

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=146811&page=1

Is this the thread you're talking about?

Please find where I said what you think I said.

Hmmm, seems that was the wrong AC3 thread. I remember that in the thread in quesiton that I'm thinking about, you got banned for one of your comments and I don't see that comment in that thread.

I got banned for calling you a tool once, and it had nothing to do with any comparison of any consoles.

Please find whatever thread you're talking about and show me this post I made. If you make a claim you're expected to back it up. 


The time I'm talking about you weren't even talking to me. You were talking to someone else and you admitted to being in the thread only to cause problems or something like that and got banned right afterward. Look at mod history. I'm sure you'll find it it unless you deleted it.



lilbroex said:
Andrespetmonkey said:
lilbroex said:
Andrespetmonkey said:

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=146811&page=1

Is this the thread you're talking about?

Please find where I said what you think I said.

Hmmm, seems that was the wrong AC3 thread. I remember that in the thread in quesiton that I'm thinking about, you got banned for one of your comments and I don't see that comment in that thread.

I got banned for calling you a tool once, and it had nothing to do with any comparison of any consoles.

Please find whatever thread you're talking about and show me this post I made. If you make a claim you're expected to back it up. 


The time I'm talking about you weren't even talking to me. You were talking to someone else and you admitted to being in the thread only to cause problems or something like that and got banned right afterward. Look at mod history. I'm sure you'll find it it unless you deleted it.

The only Nintendo-related moderations I've had are about me calling you a tool, and making a joke about the Wiimote. One was a ban, one was a warning. You can't delete mod history. If you don't believe me I'll post my entire history, or give permission to a mod to allow you to see it (if that's possible).

I don't recall this AT ALL, maybe you're confusing me with someone else. But you know how we can solve this? You can actually provide some evidence.



Andrespetmonkey said:
lilbroex said:
Andrespetmonkey said:
lilbroex said:
Andrespetmonkey said:

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=146811&page=1

Is this the thread you're talking about?

Please find where I said what you think I said.

Hmmm, seems that was the wrong AC3 thread. I remember that in the thread in quesiton that I'm thinking about, you got banned for one of your comments and I don't see that comment in that thread.

I got banned for calling you a tool once, and it had nothing to do with any comparison of any consoles.

Please find whatever thread you're talking about and show me this post I made. If you make a claim you're expected to back it up. 


The time I'm talking about you weren't even talking to me. You were talking to someone else and you admitted to being in the thread only to cause problems or something like that and got banned right afterward. Look at mod history. I'm sure you'll find it it unless you deleted it.

The only Nintendo-related moderations I've had are about me calling you a tool, and making a joke about the Wiimote. One was a ban, one was a warning. You can't delete mod history. If you don't believe me I'll post my entire history, or give permission to a mod to allow you to see it (if that's possible).

I don't recall this AT ALL, maybe you're confusing me with someone else. But you know how we can solve this? You can actually provide some evidence.


That's too many threads to go through. It was either you or Pezus but I'm pretty sure it was you caused you had that bald guy with the glasses as your avatar at the time.



lilbroex said:
pezus said:
lilbroex said:
pezus said:

Why? Since PS3 is the more powerful of the two, that's the one that Wii U should be compared to, is it not? In this thread you seem to be saying 1080p/60fps is some advantage the Wii U version has over the HD console version, and now that it isn't you've changed your argument.

Reread the post above. My argument hasn't channged at. In fact my specific argument was that it is superior because it is outputting at 1080p and its outputting at 60 FPS on 2 screens at once. I've restated this many times. You cannot deny that the Wii U verion will be technically and graphically better.

*sigh* Sure, that's what you did *rolls eyes*. That's why this thread has went on for 250 replies. *Rolls eyes again*


The thread has gone on so long because people don't want to acknolwedge that a Nintendo system has done something superior to their preferred companies hardware like always.

I still remember how Sony fans used to trumpet HD and 1080p on there console like it made it the best thing ever. The thing I find the funniest, though, is that people do things exactly like that video I posted earlier. When a Wii U game is announced 1080p they go ON AND ON AND ON about how 1080p isn't important("oh i have a 720p T.V. so it means nothing to me") but the moment a game getting denounced as not 1080p they shift over to "haha, the Wii U is weak" compltely contradicting themselves.


Funny thing is, you're acting like your talking to those exact people (fans). When you're talking to different people with different opinions of the situation and painting us with the same brush. Do you see how this line of thinking is wrong?



Around the Network
Mmmfishtacos said:
lilbroex said:
pezus said:
lilbroex said:
pezus said:

Why? Since PS3 is the more powerful of the two, that's the one that Wii U should be compared to, is it not? In this thread you seem to be saying 1080p/60fps is some advantage the Wii U version has over the HD console version, and now that it isn't you've changed your argument.

Reread the post above. My argument hasn't channged at. In fact my specific argument was that it is superior because it is outputting at 1080p and its outputting at 60 FPS on 2 screens at once. I've restated this many times. You cannot deny that the Wii U verion will be technically and graphically better.

*sigh* Sure, that's what you did *rolls eyes*. That's why this thread has went on for 250 replies. *Rolls eyes again*


The thread has gone on so long because people don't want to acknolwedge that a Nintendo system has done something superior to their preferred companies hardware like always.

I still remember how Sony fans used to trumpet HD and 1080p on there console like it made it the best thing ever. The thing I find the funniest, though, is that people do things exactly like that video I posted earlier. When a Wii U game is announced 1080p they go ON AND ON AND ON about how 1080p isn't important("oh i have a 720p T.V. so it means nothing to me") but the moment a game getting denounced as not 1080p they shift over to "haha, the Wii U is weak" compltely contradicting themselves.


Funny thing is, you're acting like your talking to those exact people (fans). When you're talking to different people with different opinions of the situation and painting us with the same brush. Do you see how this line of thinking is wrong?


I'm not talk "to" anyone. I'm talking about a demographic.



and because of some posts which have been maybe made in the past you post now over some months all these hundreds of posts to show the "fanboys" that wii u is stronger and all that 1080p or 60fps stuff?

i mean, even if there are maybe 10 guys on this site who don't believe it, for those few people you do all of that to proof them wrong?

you could do all that with just one post let's say end of the year^^



lilbroex said:
Andrespetmonkey said:
lilbroex said:

The time I'm talking about you weren't even talking to me. You were talking to someone else and you admitted to being in the thread only to cause problems or something like that and got banned right afterward. Look at mod history. I'm sure you'll find it it unless you deleted it.

The only Nintendo-related moderations I've had are about me calling you a tool, and making a joke about the Wiimote. One was a ban, one was a warning. You can't delete mod history. If you don't believe me I'll post my entire history, or give permission to a mod to allow you to see it (if that's possible).

I don't recall this AT ALL, maybe you're confusing me with someone else. But you know how we can solve this? You can actually provide some evidence.


That's too many threads to go through. It was either you or Pezus but I'm pretty sure it was you caused you had that bald guy with the glasses as your avatar at the time.

It's becoming clearer and clearer that not only have you been caught in a blatant lie, but you don't even have the decency to admit it. 

Until you actually provide even the slightest bit of evidence, I'm done.



Andrespetmonkey said:
lilbroex said:
Andrespetmonkey said:
lilbroex said:

The time I'm talking about you weren't even talking to me. You were talking to someone else and you admitted to being in the thread only to cause problems or something like that and got banned right afterward. Look at mod history. I'm sure you'll find it it unless you deleted it.

The only Nintendo-related moderations I've had are about me calling you a tool, and making a joke about the Wiimote. One was a ban, one was a warning. You can't delete mod history. If you don't believe me I'll post my entire history, or give permission to a mod to allow you to see it (if that's possible).

I don't recall this AT ALL, maybe you're confusing me with someone else. But you know how we can solve this? You can actually provide some evidence.


That's too many threads to go through. It was either you or Pezus but I'm pretty sure it was you caused you had that bald guy with the glasses as your avatar at the time.

It's becoming clearer and clearer that not only have you been caught in a blatant lie, but you don't even have the decency to admit it. 

Until you actually provide even the slightest bit of evidence, I'm done.


There is no lie here. I remember it clearly because I left a commnet on your page right afterwards. It was the only time I ever commented on your page.



lilbroex said:
Mmmfishtacos said:
lilbroex said:
pezus said:
lilbroex said:
pezus said:

Why? Since PS3 is the more powerful of the two, that's the one that Wii U should be compared to, is it not? In this thread you seem to be saying 1080p/60fps is some advantage the Wii U version has over the HD console version, and now that it isn't you've changed your argument.

Reread the post above. My argument hasn't channged at. In fact my specific argument was that it is superior because it is outputting at 1080p and its outputting at 60 FPS on 2 screens at once. I've restated this many times. You cannot deny that the Wii U verion will be technically and graphically better.

*sigh* Sure, that's what you did *rolls eyes*. That's why this thread has went on for 250 replies. *Rolls eyes again*


The thread has gone on so long because people don't want to acknolwedge that a Nintendo system has done something superior to their preferred companies hardware like always.

I still remember how Sony fans used to trumpet HD and 1080p on there console like it made it the best thing ever. The thing I find the funniest, though, is that people do things exactly like that video I posted earlier. When a Wii U game is announced 1080p they go ON AND ON AND ON about how 1080p isn't important("oh i have a 720p T.V. so it means nothing to me") but the moment a game getting denounced as not 1080p they shift over to "haha, the Wii U is weak" compltely contradicting themselves.


Funny thing is, you're acting like your talking to those exact people (fans). When you're talking to different people with different opinions of the situation and painting us with the same brush. Do you see how this line of thinking is wrong?


I'm not talk "to" anyone. I'm talking about a demographic.

So you saying everyone in the "demographic" believes the same thing. And you just the profit to deliver the "truth"? Is that what your saying? Cause it's still wrong, when i remembered many people stating that 1080 isn't a big deal, even fan's of the system.  There where a lot more people back then that thought so, but over time i believe may have been educated to the truth.