Mmmfishtacos said:
lilbroex said:
pezus said:
lilbroex said:
pezus said:
Why? Since PS3 is the more powerful of the two, that's the one that Wii U should be compared to, is it not? In this thread you seem to be saying 1080p/60fps is some advantage the Wii U version has over the HD console version, and now that it isn't you've changed your argument.
|
Reread the post above. My argument hasn't channged at. In fact my specific argument was that it is superior because it is outputting at 1080p and its outputting at 60 FPS on 2 screens at once. I've restated this many times. You cannot deny that the Wii U verion will be technically and graphically better.
|
*sigh* Sure, that's what you did *rolls eyes*. That's why this thread has went on for 250 replies. *Rolls eyes again*
|
The thread has gone on so long because people don't want to acknolwedge that a Nintendo system has done something superior to their preferred companies hardware like always.
I still remember how Sony fans used to trumpet HD and 1080p on there console like it made it the best thing ever. The thing I find the funniest, though, is that people do things exactly like that video I posted earlier. When a Wii U game is announced 1080p they go ON AND ON AND ON about how 1080p isn't important("oh i have a 720p T.V. so it means nothing to me") but the moment a game getting denounced as not 1080p they shift over to "haha, the Wii U is weak" compltely contradicting themselves.
|
Funny thing is, you're acting like your talking to those exact people (fans). When you're talking to different people with different opinions of the situation and painting us with the same brush. Do you see how this line of thinking is wrong?
|
I'm not talk "to" anyone. I'm talking about a demographic.
