pezus said:
lilbroex said:
pezus said:
lilbroex said:
pezus said:
Why? Since PS3 is the more powerful of the two, that's the one that Wii U should be compared to, is it not? In this thread you seem to be saying 1080p/60fps is some advantage the Wii U version has over the HD console version, and now that it isn't you've changed your argument.
|
Reread the post above. My argument hasn't channged at. In fact my specific argument was that it is superior because it is outputting at 1080p and its outputting at 60 FPS on 2 screens at once. I've restated this many times. You cannot deny that the Wii U verion will be technically and graphically better.
|
*sigh* Sure, that's what you did *rolls eyes*. That's why this thread has went on for 250 replies. *Rolls eyes again*
|
The thread has gone on so long because people don't want to acknolwedge that a Nintendo system has done something superior to their preferred companies hardware like always.
The thing I find the funniest, thought, that people do things exactly like that video I posted earlier. When a Wii U game is announced 1080p they go ON AND ON AND ON about how 1080p isn't important(oh i have a 720p T.V. so it means nothing to me) but the moment a game getting denounced as not 1080p they shift over to "haha, the Wii U is weak" compltely contradicting themselves.
|
Again making up facts. Who did that? You've got 5 minutes
|
Again, lying by saying I'm making up facts.
I got that "quote"(may not be words for word) from this very thread. You can look it up yourself. I'm not calling out any names but I wonder what fish tacos taste like.
