By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Why PS4 won't be cutting edge, and neither will Xbox3 - or Why Nintendo might win next gen

 

Is my reasoning sound?

Hellz yeah! Spot on 265 33.42%
 
I never thought of it like that.... 69 8.70%
 
So it's the mental institution next for you? 101 12.74%
 
So very, very wrong 266 33.54%
 
I'm a pussy with no opinion 88 11.10%
 
Total:789

I really like this thread. I have nothing smart to say, so just keep on spewing good ideas guys!



Love and tolerate.

Around the Network
nitekrawler1285 said:

They didn't strive to make it extra powerful. Vita is comparable in power to other mobile personal electronics devices launching this year. I believe one thread is using iPhone 5. 

Gotcha. I do believe the price of the Vita is right for what you get, but it's still expensive compare to the direct competitor, the 3DS, and smartphones don't really count imo because those are not dedicated handheld systems.

The Vita may be easier to develop for (although I don't think this is correct), but it's still more expensive to develop for than the 3DS, so if people don't buy the system it doesn't matter how easy it is, they won't put their games on the system.

And about the last thing you say, Sony have to eventually come out with a new system, if the competition starts selling like crazy with their newer systems Sony most counterattack by releasing a new console, because the PS3 will be considered old tech compare to the new systems, doesn't matter if it have cloud gaming or not.



Nintendo and PC gamer

Great OP.

I just wanted to add that even if one machine is significantly better than the others, that it won't be that apparent to the untrained human eye. We already know that the Wii U is more powerful than anything this generation so it's not like any of the three will have crappy graphics.

Basically what I'm saying is that technology has gotten to the point where all of the graphics on all of the machines is going to look good so MS and Sony will have to have something else as their ace in the hole.



Proud member of the SONIC SUPPORT SQUAD

Tag "Sorry man. Someone pissed in my Wheaties."

"There are like ten games a year that sell over a million units."  High Voltage CEO -  Eric Nofsinger

Kantor said:
brendude13 said:
Wii U = Dreamcast PS2

PS4 = Gamecube

Xbox 720 = Xbox

That's how I see the gap next gen.

So no PS2 then? That's rather bleak.

There, happy now? ;)



I'm on Twitter @DanneSandin!

Furthermore, I think VGChartz should add a "Like"-button.

Degausser said:
DanneSandin said:
Degausser said:
The big reason the PS3 cost so much was due to the diodes / laser thingies in the Blu-Ray player. They were forced into launching the system a year or two before they wanted to and thus had to make the price so high, and take a huge hit on the sales, to get Blu-Ray through. There shouldn't be any new format with stupidly expensive hardware in it to drive the price up like that, so the comparison is invalid imo.

However, we won't see a jump thats like compairing SD games on the Wii to HD games of PS3 / 360. However, if you've seen games like BF3 or Skyrim on PC high settings, you'll realise there is still a big gap more then capable of opening up when the consoles launch - how much it impacts on Wii's 3rd party support I don't know. I would imagine for the first few years PS3 and 360 will continue to get a lot of the games made for them anyway.

Besides, Microsoft have no idea what Sony are doing and will be developing their new console completely seperate to Sony - and they will make a powerhouse and sell it at a loss if they so desire whether or not Sony do. They can't change the thing after Sony announce the PS4 as they'll have already spent hundreds of millions on the R&D up to this point.

To me it's fairly obvious the PS4 and Xbox 3 will be a big graphical leap over the Wii U (Within what is technologically feasible with todays hardware) - it's the only reason the consoles still arn't announced and they're happy to wait it out a year or more with the Wii U on the market. Cause they need the extra time to make the 'gap' large and affordable.

Let's assume PS4 will cost 40k yen in japan - that roughly translate to $460. They could sell it at $399, taking a loss of 60 bucks. But they can't have a console costing more than that. Period. They can't afford taking bigger hits imo. Now, I don't know how much power a $460 console packs, but surely it can't be leaps over the WiiU?


 It's very hard to say as I've yet to see anyone really explain how powerful the Wii-U and until that happens comparisons are impossible. I've not yet seen anything on the Wii-U that looks much better then early PS3 games (i.e. Uncharted, COD4) but I haven't really been following it much - the ports I've seen in most cases look worse or on par with PS360, but obviously that is heavily dependent how much care the third party puts into making them.

 Still, compared to the PS3 technology has moved on some 8 years by it's launch - thats the potential for a huge leap. Further, if you look at what games like BF3 or Skyrim are capable on PC, you'll see Wii-U is nowhere near that and it's imo very likely that's where Xbox 3 and PS4 will be headed graphics wise. Neither company is really innovative enough to go down any other route by GRAPHICS GRAPHICS GRAPHICS.

 I think you'll be surprised how big a hit Sony might be willing to take too, the company is suffering by they can 'justify' loses by balancing it with the revenue from software, a profitable PS3, PSV, PSP and revenue generated from PSN. I would imagine any speculation like that heavily depends on what Microsoft end up doing and how well the Wii-U sells.

At the very least WiiU looks like on par with current PS3 games. And remember that this is early launch games. Games will only look better and better from here on.

6 years ago PS3 really were pushing the tech, so it still looks relatively good today, and therefor PS4 won't be such a big jump; one thing that made last gen so special was HD graphics. I'd imagine Sony willing to take a hit between $50-$75. Just imagine they taking a hit of $100 for every sold PS4, and they sell 10m units in one year. That's 1 BILLION in losses - in one-year!!! Sure they'll make some back in SW and such, but that's a heavy loss for a company in a bad financial state. And I think you're overestimating Sonys willingness to take such a big hit; if PS3 showed us anything is that having cutting edge consoles won't win the gen. I frankly believe Sony's afraid of having another PS3 situation right now. Cutting edge doesn't = money, so why would they invest in such a machine when they're not sure they'll make back those money??



I'm on Twitter @DanneSandin!

Furthermore, I think VGChartz should add a "Like"-button.

Around the Network
Zappykins said:
I think Sony will be a little more powerful than the WiiU as it is coming out later. But I am not sure by what amount. You really have to make a machine 2x at powerful to even notice. So if it's 5 times as powerful, it will be significant. I think Sony will really be pushing a medium price entry point and lots of high quality games - and something new which I don't think we know much of yet. (They have been trying to make the Playsation the central hub for years.)

As far as Kinect 2.0. The cost of Kinect 1.0 at launch was estimated around $50 for the hardware. Which means it should have sold for about $199 (unless you are Apple, then $399.) Kinect for Windows does sell at $249. A wholesaler wants to double the price, then the retailer doubles it again. It includes an HD colour camera (but only broadcast at ED at 640), the 3D camera, 4 microphones and some other hardware. Even if Kinect 2.0 has amazing hardware, it's not the primary cost of Kinect. The cost is the software/research.

Microsoft has spent dump trucks of money on its Natural User Interface, of which Kinect is a part. Kinect 2.0 will not be limited by the legacy X360s, the way the current one was. I think it will be stronger hardware, but the big boost will be in a significantly more powerful processor(s).

Even if they just stick with DirectX 11.1 (and I hope they go to 12 even-though I don't know what it is yet.) it takes an extremely powerful GPU to render all that extra goodness. Plus, with Kinect 2.0 they will need a super powerful CPU (or set of) for the Xbox to understand you and your environment.

Tie it all up that additional of revenue comes Xbox Live. They run a different model from Sony and Nintendo. Subscription, subscription, subscription. They can sell their hardware at a bigger loss as much of their revenue is Xlive in addition to the high attachment rate of the games.

In conclusion, I think Microsoft will have the most powerful hardware.

But they are still all limited by what is out, and technology keeps innovating along.

I concur. X3ox will be the most powerful machine next gen, but I'm not sure that will help MS. They might get their media hub they always wanted for, but Kinect 2.0 won't move much SW. Just look at Kinect 1; it's almost only 1st party games selling on it and it really isn't pushing SW much. It's kinda like the Wii! And that's why I think MS might fail next gen if they focus on Kinect 2.0; no 3rd party support and poor SW sales.



I'm on Twitter @DanneSandin!

Furthermore, I think VGChartz should add a "Like"-button.

babuks said:
DanneSandin said:
babuks said:
Since when Nintendo's WiiU is nextgen? It is late in the current gen and they got two consoles in a gen.

So having 2gb os RAM is about the same as the 512 MB PS360 has? No, WiiU is next gen. You'll find out sooner or later that PS4 will only be a slight increase of power over WIiU.


You should calculate overall computing power and not just one two components. If you say so, Wii was of PS2's gen, and now WiiU just joined HD gen.

I'd say you've missed the whole point of console gens... And this isn't the topic so discus such matters - I know I've seen this very same discussion around here in these forums before. Ask happyD, he was apart of that discussion and had a similar view to the matter as you seem to have.



I'm on Twitter @DanneSandin!

Furthermore, I think VGChartz should add a "Like"-button.

This an interesting thread with lots of good reading material. I wish I could add to it but I'm not good at predicting things like this.  Everyone keep up the great work and keep it coming .



usrevenge said:
DanneSandin said:
FrancisNobleman said:
Do not mix small jump in tech this gen from small jump in graphics.

Something that goes beyond the likes of Uncharted 3 or Beyond: Two Souls, is plain crazy. And you can achieve good results without tech being that beastly. Just improved feature sets to match DX11 is enough for you to dazzle.

Next gen games will look gorgeous on all 3 platforms despite small jump in tech.

But the so wanted Avatar visuals are not happening though...

Oh, I do believe they'll all look really good. The point is that PS4 and Xbox3 won't look THAT much better than WiiU ;)

but your wrong. I know this is a nintendo fan forum, but the ps4/xbox will be away ahead of the wiiu. the only way it won't happen is if MS and sony both decide to put out much weaker consoles then the norm at the same time. all indications point to at least Sony haveing a large upgrade in power,  MS is a toss up ( will they basically make a kinect box 2.0 or will it be a true successor)


 

I'm just gonna refer you to happysqurriels respons to this, I thought it made a lot of sense. And if you read the OP I also refer to a Viper1 post talking about why PS4 can't cost more than 40k yen in Japan.



I'm on Twitter @DanneSandin!

Furthermore, I think VGChartz should add a "Like"-button.

TheShape31 said:
DanneSandin said:
TheShape31 said:
Microsoft is in the best position to come out ahead next gen. Especially if they're able to launch with $299 and $399 pricing, Kinect 2.0, the most 3rd party support, big exclusives, an improved Xbox LIve, a native 1080p @60fps standard for all games, and solid physical gaming media (my biggest hope).

Sony is in the worst position out of the 3 by far. They can only lower the price of PS3 so much, and they don't have the funds that Nintendo and Microsoft have. Compared to a base unit costing $249-269, they'll have to release the PS4 with at least a $499 price tag and a loss. Sony may not survive this next generation, since there's really no market left for such expensive gaming machines.

Nintendo will do fine, and I feel that they will be neck and neck with the new Xbox console this time around. They'll continue to offer unique gameplay and IPs, so they're only obstacle will be pricing this time around. It's a very different economy than when Wii was launched, and people may not be willing to spend as much for that kind of tech.

I wish a new company were joining the console wars to bring a new and fresh face to the hardware scene. All 3 companies seem to be going through the motions, and not able to surprise anyone anymore.

I agree with most of your post, everything except that Xbox3 will have the most 3rd party support :) it's either gonna be equel, or if MS decides to make the über box it's more likely that WiiStation will get better support.

There's no telling at this point who will have the most 3rd party support.  But I have a feeling that during the next generation of console it will have a lot to do with how much success each one will have.  As you can see above, I never suggested that they will have the most.

Oh, my bad then =) But I don't really think 3rd party support will depend on how successful a console are: take a look at the current gen. Wii is nr1, but ain't getting any lovin' from 3rd parties. IF next gen is about equel in graphics I think 3rd parties will publish for all 3 consoles - and that's great for us gamers either way you look at it =) I think next gen is gonna be brilliant!!



I'm on Twitter @DanneSandin!

Furthermore, I think VGChartz should add a "Like"-button.