I really like this thread. I have nothing smart to say, so just keep on spewing good ideas guys!
Is my reasoning sound? | |||
Hellz yeah! Spot on | 265 | 33.42% | |
I never thought of it like that.... | 69 | 8.70% | |
So it's the mental institution next for you? | 101 | 12.74% | |
So very, very wrong | 266 | 33.54% | |
I'm a pussy with no opinion | 88 | 11.10% | |
Total: | 789 |
I really like this thread. I have nothing smart to say, so just keep on spewing good ideas guys!
nitekrawler1285 said: They didn't strive to make it extra powerful. Vita is comparable in power to other mobile personal electronics devices launching this year. I believe one thread is using iPhone 5. |
Gotcha. I do believe the price of the Vita is right for what you get, but it's still expensive compare to the direct competitor, the 3DS, and smartphones don't really count imo because those are not dedicated handheld systems.
The Vita may be easier to develop for (although I don't think this is correct), but it's still more expensive to develop for than the 3DS, so if people don't buy the system it doesn't matter how easy it is, they won't put their games on the system.
And about the last thing you say, Sony have to eventually come out with a new system, if the competition starts selling like crazy with their newer systems Sony most counterattack by releasing a new console, because the PS3 will be considered old tech compare to the new systems, doesn't matter if it have cloud gaming or not.
Nintendo and PC gamer
Great OP.
I just wanted to add that even if one machine is significantly better than the others, that it won't be that apparent to the untrained human eye. We already know that the Wii U is more powerful than anything this generation so it's not like any of the three will have crappy graphics.
Basically what I'm saying is that technology has gotten to the point where all of the graphics on all of the machines is going to look good so MS and Sony will have to have something else as their ace in the hole.
Proud member of the SONIC SUPPORT SQUAD
Tag "Sorry man. Someone pissed in my Wheaties."
"There are like ten games a year that sell over a million units." High Voltage CEO - Eric Nofsinger
Kantor said:
So no PS2 then? That's rather bleak. |
There, happy now? ;)
I'm on Twitter @DanneSandin!
Furthermore, I think VGChartz should add a "Like"-button.
Degausser said:
Still, compared to the PS3 technology has moved on some 8 years by it's launch - thats the potential for a huge leap. Further, if you look at what games like BF3 or Skyrim are capable on PC, you'll see Wii-U is nowhere near that and it's imo very likely that's where Xbox 3 and PS4 will be headed graphics wise. Neither company is really innovative enough to go down any other route by GRAPHICS GRAPHICS GRAPHICS. I think you'll be surprised how big a hit Sony might be willing to take too, the company is suffering by they can 'justify' loses by balancing it with the revenue from software, a profitable PS3, PSV, PSP and revenue generated from PSN. I would imagine any speculation like that heavily depends on what Microsoft end up doing and how well the Wii-U sells. |
At the very least WiiU looks like on par with current PS3 games. And remember that this is early launch games. Games will only look better and better from here on.
6 years ago PS3 really were pushing the tech, so it still looks relatively good today, and therefor PS4 won't be such a big jump; one thing that made last gen so special was HD graphics. I'd imagine Sony willing to take a hit between $50-$75. Just imagine they taking a hit of $100 for every sold PS4, and they sell 10m units in one year. That's 1 BILLION in losses - in one-year!!! Sure they'll make some back in SW and such, but that's a heavy loss for a company in a bad financial state. And I think you're overestimating Sonys willingness to take such a big hit; if PS3 showed us anything is that having cutting edge consoles won't win the gen. I frankly believe Sony's afraid of having another PS3 situation right now. Cutting edge doesn't = money, so why would they invest in such a machine when they're not sure they'll make back those money??
I'm on Twitter @DanneSandin!
Furthermore, I think VGChartz should add a "Like"-button.
Zappykins said: I think Sony will be a little more powerful than the WiiU as it is coming out later. But I am not sure by what amount. You really have to make a machine 2x at powerful to even notice. So if it's 5 times as powerful, it will be significant. I think Sony will really be pushing a medium price entry point and lots of high quality games - and something new which I don't think we know much of yet. (They have been trying to make the Playsation the central hub for years.) As far as Kinect 2.0. The cost of Kinect 1.0 at launch was estimated around $50 for the hardware. Which means it should have sold for about $199 (unless you are Apple, then $399.) Kinect for Windows does sell at $249. A wholesaler wants to double the price, then the retailer doubles it again. It includes an HD colour camera (but only broadcast at ED at 640), the 3D camera, 4 microphones and some other hardware. Even if Kinect 2.0 has amazing hardware, it's not the primary cost of Kinect. The cost is the software/research. Microsoft has spent dump trucks of money on its Natural User Interface, of which Kinect is a part. Kinect 2.0 will not be limited by the legacy X360s, the way the current one was. I think it will be stronger hardware, but the big boost will be in a significantly more powerful processor(s). Even if they just stick with DirectX 11.1 (and I hope they go to 12 even-though I don't know what it is yet.) it takes an extremely powerful GPU to render all that extra goodness. Plus, with Kinect 2.0 they will need a super powerful CPU (or set of) for the Xbox to understand you and your environment. Tie it all up that additional of revenue comes Xbox Live. They run a different model from Sony and Nintendo. Subscription, subscription, subscription. They can sell their hardware at a bigger loss as much of their revenue is Xlive in addition to the high attachment rate of the games. In conclusion, I think Microsoft will have the most powerful hardware. But they are still all limited by what is out, and technology keeps innovating along. |
I concur. X3ox will be the most powerful machine next gen, but I'm not sure that will help MS. They might get their media hub they always wanted for, but Kinect 2.0 won't move much SW. Just look at Kinect 1; it's almost only 1st party games selling on it and it really isn't pushing SW much. It's kinda like the Wii! And that's why I think MS might fail next gen if they focus on Kinect 2.0; no 3rd party support and poor SW sales.
I'm on Twitter @DanneSandin!
Furthermore, I think VGChartz should add a "Like"-button.
babuks said:
|
I'd say you've missed the whole point of console gens... And this isn't the topic so discus such matters - I know I've seen this very same discussion around here in these forums before. Ask happyD, he was apart of that discussion and had a similar view to the matter as you seem to have.
I'm on Twitter @DanneSandin!
Furthermore, I think VGChartz should add a "Like"-button.
This an interesting thread with lots of good reading material. I wish I could add to it but I'm not good at predicting things like this. Everyone keep up the great work and keep it coming .
usrevenge said:
but your wrong. I know this is a nintendo fan forum, but the ps4/xbox will be away ahead of the wiiu. the only way it won't happen is if MS and sony both decide to put out much weaker consoles then the norm at the same time. all indications point to at least Sony haveing a large upgrade in power, MS is a toss up ( will they basically make a kinect box 2.0 or will it be a true successor) |
I'm just gonna refer you to happysqurriels respons to this, I thought it made a lot of sense. And if you read the OP I also refer to a Viper1 post talking about why PS4 can't cost more than 40k yen in Japan.
I'm on Twitter @DanneSandin!
Furthermore, I think VGChartz should add a "Like"-button.
TheShape31 said:
There's no telling at this point who will have the most 3rd party support. But I have a feeling that during the next generation of console it will have a lot to do with how much success each one will have. As you can see above, I never suggested that they will have the most. |
Oh, my bad then =) But I don't really think 3rd party support will depend on how successful a console are: take a look at the current gen. Wii is nr1, but ain't getting any lovin' from 3rd parties. IF next gen is about equel in graphics I think 3rd parties will publish for all 3 consoles - and that's great for us gamers either way you look at it =) I think next gen is gonna be brilliant!!
I'm on Twitter @DanneSandin!
Furthermore, I think VGChartz should add a "Like"-button.