By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Wii U won’t make Achievements Mandatory for all games.

Mr Khan said:
I don't get why everyone's acting like "not mandatory" = "no fucking way this is going to happen."

We have evidence of Nintendo implementing them, and third party multiplats might as well implement if they think it'll actually help the game. The achievements that are there will be there for your friends to see.


But it doesn't matter if it's on a game by game basis. Nobody gives a shit about the achievements themselves, not even self proclaimed trophy hunters. Without the arbitrary e-peen-o-meter nobody cares about achievemnts, thats why nobody tries to 100% games on steam but everyone does it on ps3, xbox and WoW. It doesn't matter that the number doesn't do jack shit as long as my number is higher than yours.



Ongoing bet with think-man: He wins if MH4 releases in any shape or form on PSV in 2013, I win if it doesn't.

Around the Network

Nooooo!

Now how am I supposed to have fun playing my videogames!?!



Chandler said:
Mr Khan said:
I don't get why everyone's acting like "not mandatory" = "no fucking way this is going to happen."

We have evidence of Nintendo implementing them, and third party multiplats might as well implement if they think it'll actually help the game. The achievements that are there will be there for your friends to see.


But it doesn't matter if it's on a game by game basis. Nobody gives a shit about the achievements themselves, not even self proclaimed trophy hunters. Without the arbitrary e-peen-o-meter nobody cares about achievemnts, thats why nobody tries to 100% games on steam but everyone does it on ps3, xbox and WoW. It doesn't matter that the number doesn't do jack shit as long as my number is higher than yours.

I don't think that's what they meant, though. Surely accomplishments will be available for viewing between games (at your Mii), just that what they meant was that it won't be mandatory.



Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.

I really don't understand the negative reaction achievements/trophies get from some people. Perhaps, it is because a feature that both ps3/360 (and their successors will likely use) have that the Wii U will not have which, no matter how you slice it, takes away from the value of the product.

You can certainly argue that it is pointless, and it is something that you will never use, but that does not change the fact that there are plenty of gamers that care about it enough to the point where they will wait on a purchase of the system because of it. It comes down to a simple rule that less features = less overall value of a product in a general sense.

Substitute achievements with anything else ... let's take Netflix as an example. I don't use Netflix, and I don't care to ever use it, but if a system does not support it then it will lose customers who love that feature. Even though I don't use Netflix, and I have my own biased/elitist feelings against it (prefer to own physical blurays and to see films in theaters) I can understand why others would see the service as valuable, and I would think it would be a strike against a system (in a general sense) if it did not include access to that feature.

When you think about it, achievements have been a part of gaming since long before the Xbox 360. I can still remember the pride and enjoyment derived from getting a high score on an arcade cabinet and attaching my initials to it. Even Nintendo has embraced "achievements" for certain games like Zelda which has always had a collectible component to go after. It is not about epeen or anything so immature it is simply another way to enjoy gaming (a kind of meta-game that makes gaming experiences more pragmatic and connected then they otherwise would be). All gamers are asking for is a unified system where one can see a quick list of your accomplishments and compare those with friends.

I don't see the harm in this ... especially since multiplats will have lists anyways thanks to 360/ps3. Not including achievements and a basic system to gather and report them back to the player just sounds like laziness to me ... if it is so taxing for Nintendo to implement this then just crowdsource the process of making a list of achievements for each game (maybe that could be a way to make Nintendo's achievement system unique).

It is also foolish as this will most certaintly result in lost sales (most likely am going to cancel my preorder and just wait until a nice bundle comes out like I did for the Wii).



This kinda blows, seems simple enough to add and a lot of people want it so I dont see why they didnt, oh well, cant really see it changing that many peoples minds, its nothing to cancel a pre-order over.



Just a nice person :)

Around the Network

Good.

Achievements and Trophies pisses me off



If it isn't turnbased it isn't worth playing   (mostly)

And shepherds we shall be,

For Thee, my Lord, for Thee. Power hath descended forth from Thy hand, That our feet may swiftly carry out Thy command. So we shall flow a river forth to Thee And teeming with souls shall it ever be. In Nomine Patris, et Filii, et Spiritūs Sancti. -----The Boondock Saints

DarthVolod said:

I really don't understand the negative reaction achievements/trophies get from some people. Perhaps, it is because a feature that both ps3/360 (and their successors will likely use) have that the Wii U will not have which, no matter how you slice it, takes away from the value of the product.

You can certainly argue that it is pointless, and it is something that you will never use, but that does not change the fact that there are plenty of gamers that care about it enough to the point where they will wait on a purchase of the system because of it. It comes down to a simple rule that less features = less overall value of a product in a general sense.

Substitute achievements with anything else ... let's take Netflix as an example. I don't use Netflix, and I don't care to ever use it, but if a system does not support it then it will lose customers who love that feature. Even though I don't use Netflix, and I have my own biased/elitist feelings against it (prefer to own physical blurays and to see films in theaters) I can understand why others would see the service as valuable, and I would think it would be a strike against a system (in a general sense) if it did not include access to that feature.

When you think about it, achievements have been a part of gaming since long before the Xbox 360. I can still remember the pride and enjoyment derived from getting a high score on an arcade cabinet and attaching my initials to it. Even Nintendo has embraced "achievements" for certain games like Zelda which has always had a collectible component to go after. It is not about epeen or anything so immature it is simply another way to enjoy gaming (a kind of meta-game that makes gaming experiences more pragmatic and connected then they otherwise would be). All gamers are asking for is a unified system where one can see a quick list of your accomplishments and compare those with friends.

I don't see the harm in this ... especially since multiplats will have lists anyways thanks to 360/ps3. Not including achievements and a basic system to gather and report them back to the player just sounds like laziness to me ... if it is so taxing for Nintendo to implement this then just crowdsource the process of making a list of achievements for each game (maybe that could be a way to make Nintendo's achievement system unique).

It is also foolish as this will most certaintly result in lost sales (most likely am going to cancel my preorder and just wait until a nice bundle comes out like I did for the Wii).

It will have achievements... just not obligatory ones.

Again, not a big deal. If it turns out to be they'll just add the achievements. 3rd parties most likely will have them, since they're already made. I understand you a bit, but cancel a pre-order because of this is really astonishing to me, a seriously case of overeaction



Mr Khan said:
Chandler said:
Mr Khan said:
I don't get why everyone's acting like "not mandatory" = "no fucking way this is going to happen."

We have evidence of Nintendo implementing them, and third party multiplats might as well implement if they think it'll actually help the game. The achievements that are there will be there for your friends to see.


But it doesn't matter if it's on a game by game basis. Nobody gives a shit about the achievements themselves, not even self proclaimed trophy hunters. Without the arbitrary e-peen-o-meter nobody cares about achievemnts, thats why nobody tries to 100% games on steam but everyone does it on ps3, xbox and WoW. It doesn't matter that the number doesn't do jack shit as long as my number is higher than yours.

I don't think that's what they meant, though. Surely accomplishments will be available for viewing between games (at your Mii), just that what they meant was that it won't be mandatory.

 

Do you really think third parties have that much freedom to tinker around on the Miiverse? I think what they meant is the option to send out notifications to friends when you earn an ingame Achievement but still, there will be no permanent score locked to it and therefore it will be useless for all parties. We'll see how it turns out, I don't care either way. 



Ongoing bet with think-man: He wins if MH4 releases in any shape or form on PSV in 2013, I win if it doesn't.

Damn achievements and trophies are a joke? some of yall sound ignorant saying that. It should be required.



Wow.

Some reactions here are disturbing. "No Achievement/trophy, no buy?" That's quite sad.

In my case, I don't care about them. On my 360 or on Steam I play the games doing what I want or what I think is best way to progress though the game, not the way I'm forced to to get "that reward". It's not even fun in most cases.

So... whatever. If the developer wants, they will be there and they'll be in Miiverse so anyone can see them, and if they don't want then it's nothing to worry about.



Please excuse my bad English.

Former gaming PC: i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070

Current gaming PC: R5-7600, 32GB RAM 6000MT/s (CL30) and a RX 9060XT 16GB

Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet    Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.