so the movie made about 150 million up till now, how good is that compared to the other spiderman movies? and how good is that in general ?
so the movie made about 150 million up till now, how good is that compared to the other spiderman movies? and how good is that in general ?
It's a comic book movie for non-comic book fans. I'm sure most people will end up liking it in the end as long as they aren't too stooped in Spider-Man lore.
As for me, I'm actually enjoying the game so much (don't get carried away, though. It's still a 7.5/10 title) that I'm gonna go buy at least one more Spidey game, today!
I was definitely disappointed. I've been waiting for this for years, so it was a letdown. The first third to half of the movie was pretty bad, and was the main issue overall. Everything just felt so anticlimactic and rough around the edges, which is without a doubt the director's fault. I really felt almost nothing for the characters of uncle Ben or aunt may. The movie definitely got a lot better from the second third/half of the movie.
I really liked Andrew Garfield and Emma stone, think they both did great jobs, especially Garfield. The lizard was a much better villian than I was expecting. He was so big and powerful that I was actually on the edge of my seat in the fighting scenes bc it really seemed like he could crush Spiderman if he had the chance.
I definitely think all the negatives of ASM were due to directorial issues. Marc Webb has done one movie that he's known for, and it was a depressing romance movie. I love Sony, but I have no idea what they were thinking entrusting their biggest franchise in his hands
pezus said:
Hey! 500 days of summer is really good |
I think for all the people knocking the Raimi movies need to remember that before his spiderman in 2002 superhero movies were either the laughing stock of hollywood (from batman and robin) or just meh (like the first X-men movie) . Those spiderman movies are why superhero gets so much of hype these days from there on we got spiderman 2, TDK, Ironman, Avengers and so on. This movie would be considered good to me pre spiderman in 2002.
My 3ds friendcode: 5413-0232-9676 (G-cyber)
I missed Harry Osbourne, I hope they introduce him in the 2nd movie with Norman as green goblin. If they follow the comics, Goblin can kill Gwen and then die which sets up TASM3 with Peter trying to get over her death which ultimately leads to some anger/fear problems -> V e n o m <3.
Oh and pick a fucking good Mary Jane for the 3rd movie. I wouldnt even mind if it was Emma just with red hair hahaha.
And for gods' sake make sure Goblin and Venom are good :P.
cyberninja45 said: I can't say that I enjoyed this movie. To me a reboot of a movie that I saw 10 yrs ago I would expect it to better in every way (at least the studios should try to make it that way). Lets get the obvious out of the way if you saw it in 3d it was pretty much a waste because you could have watched most of the movie without the 3d glasses actually. *fixed* And did no one else here see that crane scene I mean come on. |
I loved everything about the movie. I never read any of the comics,so I can't really compare it in that way.
cyberninja45 said:
I think for all the people knocking the Raimi movies need to remember that before his spiderman in 2002 superhero movies were either the laughing stock of hollywood (from batman and robin) or just meh (like the first X-men movie) . Those spiderman movies are why superhero gets so much of hype these days from there on we got spiderman 2, TDK, Ironman, Avengers and so on. This movie would be considered good to me pre spiderman in 2002. |
I never looked at it like that but that's actually very true. If the bar hadn't been raised fairly recently, I'd be all over this movie.
I hated this movie. Unwatchable. I watched it with some friends right now and hated it. They didn't like it much either.
I promised to take my mom to see it (she loves Spidey) but I don't know if I can because I do not want to watch this movie again.
I'd give it a 4/10 for some few decent action scenes.
Boutros said: I much prefer the Tobey Spider-Man. He makes a lot more sense. Why would a guy like the Garfield Spider-Man who has cool hair, good looks and a bad ass attitude (+ he does skateboard!) have no friends and get bullied? |
cyberninja45 said: I think for all the people knocking the Raimi movies need to remember that before his spiderman in 2002 superhero movies were either the laughing stock of hollywood (from batman and robin) or just meh (like the first X-men movie) . Those spiderman movies are why superhero gets so much of hype these days from there on we got spiderman 2, TDK, Ironman, Avengers and so on. This movie would be considered good to me pre spiderman in 2002. |
You know Spider-Man did not start the Superhero movie hype, it was X-Men in 2000. Actually it was Blade 1998 but most people did not even know that Blade was a Marvel Superhero. After that came Spider-Man which was the first huge Superhero success with braking several records and earning a lot money. But without the first X-Men movie Spider-Man would never have become that huge, at least the first one would not.