| Roma said: I'm hoping for 5D this time! and make it work Sony as last time i tried 4D on PS3 it did not work goddammit! |
It's about time we went to 5D I have been playing 4D games for 15 years
@TheVoxelman on twitter
Will PS4 be alien technology? | |||
| Yeah | 208 | 53.06% | |
| No | 183 | 46.68% | |
| Total: | 391 | ||
| Roma said: I'm hoping for 5D this time! and make it work Sony as last time i tried 4D on PS3 it did not work goddammit! |
It's about time we went to 5D I have been playing 4D games for 15 years
@TheVoxelman on twitter
Roma said:
Who cares about money when you can look good in front of your fans and the media? |
and recieve tons of 1st/3rd party support an amazing library of games and services that gets bigger and better all year, every year since launch right who cares...beacause I sure don't
zarx said:
|
I thought 4D was only available on PS3…. 
| R.I.P Mr Iwata :'( | ||
![]() |
|
|
Roma said:
I thought 4D was only available on PS3…. |
I don't know about you but I seem to remember polygonal 3D games that were animated (progressing though time the 4th dimension of spacetime).
@TheVoxelman on twitter
| Roma said: I'm hoping for 5D this time! and make it work Sony as last time i tried 4D on PS3 it did not work goddammit! |
5D is so .... 2007. This is SONY we're talking about. They'll heve 6D!!!!
Meanwhile, the Wii U doesn't even have 4D yet. Shame

IamAwsome said:
5D is so .... 2007. This is SONY we're talking about. They'll heve 6D!!!! Meanwhile, the Wii U doesn't even have 4D yet. Shame |
...Not fifty? But sixty? Sixty what?
You can have a significant leap with 600 USD PCs right now.
I read from that statement that they will wait till these specs become cheaper for them, otherwise they just can't afford it. A company that is worth 15 billion USD can't afford a product that they expect to lose 3 billion in the first 2-3 years.
Well at least if you try to be sustainable. Sony has not beed sustainable for the better part of the past decade.
Imagine not having GamePass on your console...
| DirtyP2002 said: You can have a significant leap with 600 USD PCs right now. I read from that statement that they will wait till these specs become cheaper for them, otherwise they just can't afford it. A company that is worth 15 billion USD can't afford a product that they expect to lose 3 billion in the first 2-3 years. Well at least if you try to be sustainable. Sony has not beed sustainable for the better part of the past decade. |
When companies cry taking losses on console sales, they don't tell you they are actually making a profit overall. They can afford to take a loss for consoles as retail game sales make them money, and now with PS+ (Plus) they have a double-whammy. As long as people buy games, they are fine. It's just a marketing strategy to make them look noble, that they are taking a loss when in they really aren't.
Pesmerga7551 said:
When companies cry taking losses on console sales, they don't tell you they are actually making a profit overall. They can afford to take a loss for consoles as retail game sales make them money, and now with PS+ (Plus) they have a double-whammy. As long as people buy games, they are fine. It's just a marketing strategy to make them look noble, that they are taking a loss when in they really aren't. |
I know the razor-blade stuff.
The point is, that this is still a risky strategy. Look how Sony failed 2006 - 2009.
Imagine not having GamePass on your console...
| Pesmerga7551 said: I personally think $400 is the best entry price point. Then make an advanced bundle at $450-500 with a 1TB HDD and...I don't know, I am not Sony's idea man. $400 makes sense to me for a new console, and people would ride that train I believe. $500 is pushing it for the low-side entry bundle. |
It would be better if they release it at 499, then pricecut it to 399 the next year. I honestly think people are willing to pay 500 bucks for a PS4 this time round with all the craze of tablets, smartphones etc.
PS3 got its pricecut to 399 after 2 years in the market wich was way too late.

