By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Explain why people love Pokemon games to me please!

_crazy_man_ on 17 April 2012
Rath said:
Michael-5 said:
Rath said:
_crazy_man_ said:

IMO its.

II > III > V > I > IV    (Remakes not a factor)

Gen 3 was like 2002-2006

I was in Middle/High School then and my parents were no longer giving me money to buy games.

So with what money I could earn I focused more on my GC games than my GBA games. ;p

I agree, gen II were the best games.

Gen I had the best pokemon though, can't beat the original 151.

Really, that's your order of preference?

For me it's I = II > V > III > IV

Diamond/Pearl were the worst, but I thought Ruby/Saphire also marked a lowpoint in the franchise. Black/White to me marked a rebound in quality, but nothing will match the quality of the first 2 and the uniqueness of those two generations of Pokemon.

Why did they get lazy? and why didn't they introduce new types after Gen II?


My agreement was only with Gen II being the best =P

I haven't clocked V yet and I also think that III/IV were pretty weak.

Well opinions are opinions.

Seems like evryone agrees IV was the worst. Not saying gen IV was bad just the worst.



NNID: crazy_man

3DS FC: 3969 4633 0700 

 My Pokemon Trading Shop (Hidden Power Breeding)

Around the Network
Michael-5 on 17 April 2012
_crazy_man_ said:
Michael-5 said:
Rath said:
_crazy_man_ said:

IMO its.

II > III > V > I > IV    (Remakes not a factor)

Gen 3 was like 2002-2006

I was in Middle/High School then and my parents were no longer giving me money to buy games.

So with what money I could earn I focused more on my GC games than my GBA games. ;p

I agree, gen II were the best games.

Gen I had the best pokemon though, can't beat the original 151.

Really, that's your order of preference?

For me it's I = II > V > III > IV

Diamond/Pearl were the worst, but I thought Ruby/Saphire also marked a lowpoint in the franchise. Black/White to me marked a rebound in quality, but nothing will match the quality of the first 2 and the uniqueness of those two generations of Pokemon.

Why did they get lazy? and why didn't they introduce new types after Gen II?

More types would complicate things.  The current system is fine as it is.

True, but I think the addition of Steel & Dark type Pokemon was a great one.

I think the lazyness of unique Pokemon is a bigger issue. I mean Dragon type legendaries? lameness of starters, and clones (Black has a 3 tier fighter, psychic?, ghost, and rock pokemon like Red, where the 3rd tier is evolved by trade)? Pokemon are less original then they used to be, and damn, too many legendaries!

I also hate how now different versions unlock different legendaries....



What is with all the hate? Don't read GamrReview Articles. Contact me to ADD games to the Database
Vote for the March Most Wanted / February Results

Michael-5 on 17 April 2012
_crazy_man_ said:
Rath said:
Michael-5 said:
Rath said:
_crazy_man_ said:

IMO its.

II > III > V > I > IV    (Remakes not a factor)

I agree, gen II were the best games.

Gen I had the best pokemon though, can't beat the original 151.

Really, that's your order of preference?

For me it's I = II > V > III > IV

Diamond/Pearl were the worst, but I thought Ruby/Saphire also marked a lowpoint in the franchise. Black/White to me marked a rebound in quality, but nothing will match the quality of the first 2 and the uniqueness of those two generations of Pokemon.


My agreement was only with Gen II being the best =P

I haven't clocked V yet and I also think that III/IV were pretty weak.

Well opinions are opinions.

Seems like evryone agrees IV was the worst. Not saying gen IV was bad just the worst.

Most people seem to agree II was the best. Even one guy who didn't like II, put the gen II remake as his second favorite (maybe he can't stand the retro graphics?).

P.S. I love how your room always has the most recent home console. I can't remember if Red/Blue had a SNES or N64 (I recall a SNES), but since then the tv's have upgraded and so has the consoles....You Mom still aparently sleeps in the kitchen though.



What is with all the hate? Don't read GamrReview Articles. Contact me to ADD games to the Database
Vote for the March Most Wanted / February Results

_crazy_man_ on 17 April 2012
Michael-5 said:
_crazy_man_ said:
Rath said:
Michael-5 said:
Rath said:
_crazy_man_ said:

IMO its.

II > III > V > I > IV    (Remakes not a factor)

I agree, gen II were the best games.

Gen I had the best pokemon though, can't beat the original 151.

Really, that's your order of preference?

For me it's I = II > V > III > IV

Diamond/Pearl were the worst, but I thought Ruby/Saphire also marked a lowpoint in the franchise. Black/White to me marked a rebound in quality, but nothing will match the quality of the first 2 and the uniqueness of those two generations of Pokemon.


My agreement was only with Gen II being the best =P

I haven't clocked V yet and I also think that III/IV were pretty weak.

Well opinions are opinions.

Seems like evryone agrees IV was the worst. Not saying gen IV was bad just the worst.

Most people seem to agree II was the best. Even one guy who didn't like II, put the gen II remake as his second favorite (maybe he can't stand the retro graphics?).

P.S. I love how your room always has the most recent home console. I can't remember if Red/Blue had a SNES or N64 (I recall a SNES), but since then the tv's have upgraded and so has the consoles....You Mom still aparently sleeps in the kitchen though.

Nintendo's hidden message on thier views of woman!?!



NNID: crazy_man

3DS FC: 3969 4633 0700 

 My Pokemon Trading Shop (Hidden Power Breeding)

TheKoreanGuy on 17 April 2012

This is why: http://i.imgur.com/ac3eh.png



Around the Network
Salnax on 18 April 2012
Michael-5 said:
_crazy_man_ said:
Rath said:
Michael-5 said:
Rath said:
_crazy_man_ said:

IMO its.

II > III > V > I > IV    (Remakes not a factor)

I agree, gen II were the best games.

Gen I had the best pokemon though, can't beat the original 151.

Really, that's your order of preference?

For me it's I = II > V > III > IV

Diamond/Pearl were the worst, but I thought Ruby/Saphire also marked a lowpoint in the franchise. Black/White to me marked a rebound in quality, but nothing will match the quality of the first 2 and the uniqueness of those two generations of Pokemon.


My agreement was only with Gen II being the best =P

I haven't clocked V yet and I also think that III/IV were pretty weak.

Well opinions are opinions.

Seems like evryone agrees IV was the worst. Not saying gen IV was bad just the worst.

Most people seem to agree II was the best. Even one guy who didn't like II, put the gen II remake as his second favorite (maybe he can't stand the retro graphics?).


I think generation 2 is pretty good. I just think that the gameplay has become more balanced and refined since then, that gen 2 had the worst story by far, and that its tied with gen 4 for the worst batch of Pokemon, if only because there are relatively few of them. Oh, and the starters were boring.

I still have a weak spot for the 8 bit graphics and chiptunes though.



My friend is a Vtuber, check him out.

_crazy_man_ on 18 April 2012

Hey now Feraligator was kick ass.

The other 2 were bad I agree.



NNID: crazy_man

3DS FC: 3969 4633 0700 

 My Pokemon Trading Shop (Hidden Power Breeding)

Rath on 18 April 2012

The starters for Gen II are better than those of III/IV/V.

Original starters are by far the best though.



Deoz on 18 April 2012
Rath said:
The starters for Gen II are better than those of III/IV/V.

Original starters are by far the best though.


Better in design or usefulness? 



Rath on 18 April 2012
Deoz said:
Rath said:
The starters for Gen II are better than those of III/IV/V.

Original starters are by far the best though.


Better in design or usefulness? 

Design