Rath said:
Michael-5 said:
Rath said:
_crazy_man_ said:
IMO its.
II > III > V > I > IV (Remakes not a factor)
Gen 3 was like 2002-2006
I was in Middle/High School then and my parents were no longer giving me money to buy games.
So with what money I could earn I focused more on my GC games than my GBA games. ;p
|
I agree, gen II were the best games.
Gen I had the best pokemon though, can't beat the original 151.
|
Really, that's your order of preference?
For me it's I = II > V > III > IV
Diamond/Pearl were the worst, but I thought Ruby/Saphire also marked a lowpoint in the franchise. Black/White to me marked a rebound in quality, but nothing will match the quality of the first 2 and the uniqueness of those two generations of Pokemon.
Why did they get lazy? and why didn't they introduce new types after Gen II?
|
My agreement was only with Gen II being the best =P
I haven't clocked V yet and I also think that III/IV were pretty weak.
|
Well opinions are opinions.
Seems like evryone agrees IV was the worst. Not saying gen IV was bad just the worst.
