By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Capcom defends on-disc DLC

wtf are you people talking about... You people have it wrong... DLC means DISC LOCKED CONTENT..



 

Face the future.. Gamecenter ID: nikkom_nl (oh no he didn't!!) 

Around the Network
NiKKoM said:
wtf are you people talking about... You people have it wrong... DLC means DISC LOCKED CONTENT..


HAHAHAHAHA!!!! RE LOL!!! That made my day XD



"We value our customers."

It's nice to see Capcom opening with a joke like that. Always good that the tried and true methods of breaking the tension never die.



I feel the same about Dragon's Dogma. I really want to try it early but I don't want to risk buying the game twice.

And on-disc DLC is really really awkward and plain wrong.



NiKKoM said:
wtf are you people talking about... You people have it wrong... DLC means DISC LOCKED CONTENT..

 

Shhhhh, don't give Crapcom any new arguements. 



Around the Network

No company should be allowed to release DLC for their games until like 3 months after its release. That way we will know they didn't purposefully omit whichever content from the game just to make a few extra bucks from us.
I also totally agree there shouldn't be locked content on their games (it will give hackers the incentive to get cheat codes to unlock it anyway).



The only ones that can regulate this practice is Nintendo, Microsoft, and Sony. They need to publicly condemn the practice. They need to make it a standard that the game released is complete and real DLC must add value. No "horse armor" or cheat codes unless they are free.



d21lewis said:
The only ones that can regulate this practice is Nintendo, Microsoft, and Sony. They need to publicly condemn the practice. They need to make it a standard that the game released is complete and real DLC must add value. No "horse armor" or cheat codes unless they are free.

I actually prefer the Horse Armor DLC/Costume DLC  because there's no reason to by them, unless your an uber fan that wants to fool with the look of the game. 

The issue is more of meaningful content that is cut from the game, which is always debatable on that entails

I agree that it's Sony, MS, and Nintendo's job to regulate this. I think it would be good if they put a cap at like only releasing a max of $15(idk realistic amount) dollars of DLC for the game. No on-disc DLC etc. On PC this would still be an issue, but most of these games primary platform isn't PC.



At Capcom, we value our customers 

 

Isn't this the same company that released Resident Evil: The Mercenaries 3D, which was made so you could only play the game once, thereby destroying any replay value for gamers who bought it legitametly.