By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - Call of Duty for Vita? Update: N-Space not developing Black Ops 2 for handhelds!

 

Call of Duty for Vita?

Brand new title 55 43.65%
 
Black Ops 2 41 32.54%
 
Modern Warfare 3 3 2.38%
 
Remake of old title 7 5.56%
 
Undecided 5 3.97%
 
See results 15 11.90%
 
Total:126

@NintendoPie I'm only doing games we already know but don't know much about them or games that are rumored to come out. Grand Theft Auto is my next one since it's been rumored for a long time. I don't know about Hello Kitty, more like a title that would stay in Japan.



Read my original story on Fictionpress (Shinigami Twin): http://www.fictionpress.com/s/2996503/1/Shinigami-Twin 

As well as my other one (Hell's Punishment): http://www.fictionpress.com/s/3085054/1/Hell-s-Punishment

Nintendo Network ID: kingofe3

Around the Network
RolStoppable said:
Chark said:
I really think it will be a new title. Why wouldn't it be closer to the launch window if it was just a port. Developers rave over the ease of development. They would be able to pop out a port or remake in no time. Plus Actiblizzard wants to sell a bunch of copies, being a unique title will help that and increase Vita sales, leading to even more copies being sold. Why would they risk releasing a simple port at this point in the game when the user base is so small?

Your (rhethorical) question at the end strikes me as odd. A new title would be much more expensive to make than a port and if the userbase is low, going with the cheaper option would be a smaller risk. This is a third party game we are talking about here, after all. Third parties aren't interested in driving installed bases, unless they get paid for it by the console manufacturer. Their usual modus operanti is to play it safe either by investing not much money into development or by delaying releases until the userbase has reached a sufficient level. In extreme cases it can be both.

You're right Rol, that didn't come out right. Let me explain: Vita is a new market opportunity with few games available, Activision could take advantage of this situation not only to sel SW but to create a user base filled with their target audience. They already release a new CoD title every year with great success, they could do the same on Vita with expected growth year-to-year. They could go cheap and port something and though it would sell well anyway, it would be recieve mixed reviews and pale to a unique title. Not to mention fail to attract future customers to the Vita. A port should have already been made since this is a big company I doubt they would have waited so long to create a cheap title. I feel signs pointing towards a unique title as an investment for the future, despite the fact any CoD game is going to make money this would be a smarter route. If Sony is willing to assist in its development, even more reason.

When i was writing this I had a revelation. What if at E3 during Sony's presentation they call to the stage a higher up for CoD and he announces a new CoD releasing in December that will be free to download for all CoD Elite subscribers for the month of December! Imagine the sales boost. So many people would buy Vita, more people would subscribe to Elite. The Vita user base would be jammed packed full of CoD fans and after december the new CoD would have massive legs because of how many people are playing it already. It would attract those that didnt buy a vita downthe road through word of mouth and peer pressure. Then Activision's next title will have record sales. No need for a price this year because a ton of people will be getting their Vita between E3 and Christmas.



Before the PS3 everyone was nice to me :(

Mr Puggsly said:
Jay520 said:
I don't know about this one. I doubt it will do very much. CoD already has the userbase cemented on the PS3 & 360. I don't see them playing on the Vita at this point in time. Surely, it would do modestly. It does have the CoD name after all.

If a Vita port could achieve 1 - 2 million sales it would most likely be considered worthwhile. But Vita's userbase is so small that may be difficult to achieve that in the near future.

Its worth testing the water and could be Vita's best selling game.



Definitely. It should be at least modestly successful because of the CoD name.

Pokemonbrawlvg said:
@NintendoPie I'm only doing games we already know but don't know much about them or games that are rumored to come out. Grand Theft Auto is my next one since it's been rumored for a long time. I don't know about Hello Kitty, more like a title that would stay in Japan.

I hope you know that I was kidding...



@NintendoPie I know, it just seems like Hello Kitty would be on Vita. I don't know why, but just does.



Read my original story on Fictionpress (Shinigami Twin): http://www.fictionpress.com/s/2996503/1/Shinigami-Twin 

As well as my other one (Hell's Punishment): http://www.fictionpress.com/s/3085054/1/Hell-s-Punishment

Nintendo Network ID: kingofe3

Around the Network

Their best chance at success is to find a successful portable fps and emulate it.



"Everything we hear is an opinion, not a fact. Everything we see is a perspective, not the truth." -My good friend Mark Aurelius

NintendoPie said:
Pokemonbrawlvg said:
@NintendoPie I'm only doing games we already know but don't know much about them or games that are rumored to come out. Grand Theft Auto is my next one since it's been rumored for a long time. I don't know about Hello Kitty, more like a title that would stay in Japan.

I hope you know that I was kidding...



Kidding? Where's the funny?

Duplicate post



RolStoppable said:
Chark said:

You're right Rol, that didn't come out right. Let me explain: Vita is a new market opportunity with few games available, Activision could take advantage of this situation not only to sel SW but to create a user base filled with their target audience. They already release a new CoD title every year with great success, they could do the same on Vita with expected growth year-to-year. They could go cheap and port something and though it would sell well anyway, it would be recieve mixed reviews and pale to a unique title. Not to mention fail to attract future customers to the Vita. A port should have already been made since this is a big company I doubt they would have waited so long to create a cheap title. I feel signs pointing towards a unique title as an investment for the future, despite the fact any CoD game is going to make money this would be a smarter route. If Sony is willing to assist in its development, even more reason.

When i was writing this I had a revelation. What if at E3 during Sony's presentation they call to the stage a higher up for CoD and he announces a new CoD releasing in December that will be free to download for all CoD Elite subscribers for the month of December! Imagine the sales boost. So many people would buy Vita, more people would subscribe to Elite. The Vita user base would be jammed packed full of CoD fans and after december the new CoD would have massive legs because of how many people are playing it already. It would attract those that didnt buy a vita downthe road through word of mouth and peer pressure. Then Activision's next title will have record sales. No need for a price this year because a ton of people will be getting their Vita between E3 and Christmas.

The first paragraph could have been applied just as well to the Wii. Western publishers have a certain ranking for gaming platforms, with Nintendo systems and handhelds being at the bottom of the barrel, so even below smartphones. Based on historic precedence you better don't get your hopes up.

As for the second paragraph, this would require Sony to pay Activision for the loss in revenue. At $50 a pop and two million copies (for ease of calculation), that would already be a $100 million money hat. At that point Sony could fund the development of an original Call of Duty game that isn't given away for free, plus a sizeable marketing campaign just for this game. Either way, it would be the biggest money hat in video game history and Sony has the least amount of money to throw around out of the big three.

First paragraph: There were plenty of CoD games on Wii and DS, releasing a unique title would just take some initiative and would make good use of the gyro and touch screen. Imagine disarming a bomb, having the screen zoom in and you had to entire the correct code on the number pad or cut a certain wire. Or operating a mounted gun and panning around to aim it, just like in real life. They could make a knock out game. History be damned too, even though the PSP wanted to provde home console quality games their controlls never let it happen. Handhelds are moving up.

Second paragraph: Come on Rol, you know better than that. Retailers and wholesallers take their cut out of the price tag, the cost per unit is much cheaper. Plus it would be digital, so no physical related costs. If it spurred "2 million" Vita purchases Sony would be more than happy to pay the ~20 per game that month, but the real benefit would be Sony's advertisement help. Compare this idea to what it would cost to have a price cut and it is petty cash.



Before the PS3 everyone was nice to me :(

Sony said something about buying the PS3 version of a game and getting a Vita version. That's what I want to see. It doesn't even have to be a full game. Just a bite sized version for the Vita--a really short campaign and its own take on multi-player something to tide people over until they can get back to the console. Maybe it can unlock exclusive weapons in the PS3 version.

Do something like this for all of the big PS3 games. Don't compete with the PS3 by making your own version. The best thing to do is compliment the PS3 version.