I don't really see what peoples problem with this is. It's plenty easy to find websites dedicated to NSFW content, I don't see why this website (which is about games) needs to have NSFW or borderline NSFW stuff on every page.

well... it falls under the cleavage rule... I think... so... argh! I DON'T WANT TO LOSE YOKO! Blacksaber and I put so much work into it! I AM NOT THINKING ABOUT ALL THE OTHERS! I WANT TO KEEP YOKO! (I still don't know if my sig is acceptable or not)

Well... okay... hew... calm down. Now that thats out I can think normally again. Well lets just compare your avatar to that from ioi, both do not depict much more cleavage... and yours isn't in a sexual explicit pose either... so you could say that either both are not regarded "illegal" or both are ;P

Cause worst case scenario people will put pictures of themselfs as avatar... and we all know we don't want that... *shivers*

ok i can explain it why it's a problem for me. i just don't get why my last picture for example with the bikini girl which was officially on a  fifa beach soccer tourney or let's say a beach volleyball game pic from olympia isn't sfw but a comic character drinking like an alcoholic out of a bottle is sfw. i just don't get it? what's the difference if someone on work sees that?

is it cool in america (or english speaking countries where people act most of the time like americans if it's about that) to be on a site about videogames were many waste a lot of time with (like me) but not if you are interested in girls/men?

Define "cleavage." I've had one signature in the past that would definitely break this rule (around August 2011), but one that would be borderline (August 2010), and i'd like to know where the median lies...

Edit: oh yeah, and this signature as well, though i would in no way qualify it as sensual or nsfw.

Admit it. "Cleavage," is going too far.

My avatar wont change, no matter how any of you look at it

-

Also, no more "So life like".

So you're saying I got one week....

That would require someone to actually fix the site, something that hasn't happened for at least 9 months under the promise that the site is going to upgrade sometime TBD (which keeps getting pushed back, and back, and back)

As difficult as it is to trust Australians, I think he has a point.

and who made you our moral guardian , 99.9% of the avatars on this site are tame ,no full frontal or topless woman showing there nipples , gee the outside world shows more just go to the beach or mall and also a lot of peoples comments on topless men smack of homophobia .