That is the Sony Tablet P. It's coming soon and a very interesting concept that it turned out to be (wasn't well received at first unveiling). You should check it out online, one of the best tabs out imo.

there are both tablets from sony

my point here is that the thread arthor seems to be passing the impression that sony only started working on tablets or technology associated with them after nintendo's reveal which is put simply nonsense

he seems to be forgetting the fact that they make electronics outside of gaming consoles and released two tablets last year

It looks very..... unportable.

glimmer_of_hope said: Euphoria14 said: Hey, why you keep ignoring my posts? You say this is about tablets, yet you mention the GBA cable. I prove the GBA cable was not first, and you ignore it. So, I prove Sony did streaming from console game to handheld first, you ignore it. You later try to finally rebut by using the GBA cable and I rebut it again, with you of course ignoring once again. Do I expect an answer in the next thread? I referred to GBA because the other person referred to PSP, reminding him that PSP was not the first to have connectivity to a console. If you were to keep reading you would also see that I said it has nothing to do with handhelds, I said that conversation was made as a "smoke screen" to steer off of my post. I have said quite a few times now, this is for something new, it was filed in 2010.....not PSP or remote play. You need to be a little patient man, I am doing other things. I cannot reply to every frivolous reply instantly!

You don't need to answer any of them actually. It took me 8 pages of back and forth with o_O.Q until I finally settled with Torillian that Nintendo didn't base the N64 design off the vectrex, Sony didn't copy Nintendo's technology, but sony followed Nintendo's lead (copied their business idea, not the tech). Let's see how long it takes for you to bring them out of denial for this one. And it's all hypothetical anyways (drafts of patents and whatnot, nothing official.)

One thing is certain, is that if Sony also releases a controller to its next system with a large embedded screen with wireless image streaming and touch controls, you can be sure the business idea is a direct retaliation to Nintendo's business move. Of course, they aren't copying the tech per se (that tech already existed long ago, and I even predicted the tech used in the WiiU controller before it even was revealed, due to my basic background in computer networking.) No, it would be the business idea that's being copied. Copy copy copy - paste, go Kitler, make it pretty!

name me some SOny fans who have said it, point them out, cause i already name one Ninty fan and I can name at least one more

Haha i know what you mean, though i still like the design personally.

glimmer_of_hope said: Euphoria14 said: Hey, why you keep ignoring my posts? You say this is about tablets, yet you mention the GBA cable. I prove the GBA cable was not first, and you ignore it. So, I prove Sony did streaming from console game to handheld first, you ignore it. You later try to finally rebut by using the GBA cable and I rebut it again, with you of course ignoring once again. Do I expect an answer in the next thread? I referred to GBA because the other person referred to PSP, reminding him that PSP was not the first to have connectivity to a console. If you were to keep reading you would also see that I said it has nothing to do with handhelds, I said that conversation was made as a "smoke screen" to steer off of my post. I have said quite a few times now, this is for something new, it was filed in 2010.....not PSP or remote play. You need to be a little patient man, I am doing other things. I cannot reply to every frivolous reply instantly!

You said that in this thread, not the one prior to this one. In the previous thread you made no mention of a "smoke screen", you only made the thread to talk about how Sony copies. Or did you forget and think that what you now said here is the only one that counts?

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=139540&page=1

You kept switching arguments too in order to support your idea that Sony copied Nintendo as well, like when the Move and it's patents were brought up and it was shrugged off due to "candles".  Your argument for the Wii U against the 2009 patent shown was that the Wii U was in "planning stages from 2008". If I am not mistaken, those candles, balls, etc... were the "planning stages" too.

You say you're persistant because you're right, which is quite the cocky stance (I would know, I am the same way), but the fact is that you are persistant because you hope that you might end up being right, even though you continue to shift your argument from what it began as.

Wheres your proof?? Cause of a patent?? Really?? that means nothing. I brouht up PSP because alot of the things the Wii U can do is some of the things PSP remote play aleady does, so who's copying who?

You're just speculating nonsense, What you think SOny is going to make a tablet specifically for PS4?? They could, I doubt it, not when they are launching a new portable that could already do some of the things Wii U will do and they have their own actual tablets, use somes sense here

happydolphin said: glimmer_of_hope said: Euphoria14 said: Hey, why you keep ignoring my posts? You say this is about tablets, yet you mention the GBA cable. I prove the GBA cable was not first, and you ignore it. So, I prove Sony did streaming from console game to handheld first, you ignore it. You later try to finally rebut by using the GBA cable and I rebut it again, with you of course ignoring once again. Do I expect an answer in the next thread? I referred to GBA because the other person referred to PSP, reminding him that PSP was not the first to have connectivity to a console. If you were to keep reading you would also see that I said it has nothing to do with handhelds, I said that conversation was made as a "smoke screen" to steer off of my post. I have said quite a few times now, this is for something new, it was filed in 2010.....not PSP or remote play. You need to be a little patient man, I am doing other things. I cannot reply to every frivolous reply instantly! You don't need to answer any of them actually. It took me 8 pages of back and forth withh o_O.Q until I finally settled with Torillian that Nintendo didn't base the N64 design off the vectrex, sony didn't copy Nintendo's technology, but sony followed Nintendo's lead (copied their business idea, not the tech). Let's see how long it takes for you to bring them out of denial for this one. And it's all hypothetical anyways (drafts of patents and whatnot, nothing official.) One thing is certain, is that if Sony also releases a controller to its next system with a large embedded screen with wireless image streaming and touch controls, you can be sure the business idea is a direct retaliation to Nintendo's business move. Of course, they aren't copying the tech per se (that tech already existed long ago, and I even predicted the tech used in the WiiU controller before it even was revealed, due to my basic background in computer networking.) No, it would be the business idea that's being copied. Copy copy copy - paste, go Kitler, make it pretty!

"if Sony also releases a controller to its next system with a large embedded screen with wireless image streaming and touch controls"

yeah sony has never done anything like that...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TrYXsPMg9lM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mASdFCTNA7I

Whoops, didn't mean to be redundant. But some people just don't seem to stop and think.  =/