Play4Fun said:
zarx said:
| Play4Fun said:
Nope, I don't think that at all.
But your previous posts about Wii-U being a Dreamcast to Xbox gap power-wise at best if Sony and MS go conservative and N64 to Xbox gap at worst has shown me that though you should not be taken seriously in this kind of discussion despite knowing PC tech well.
|
explain
|
Beyond3D Posters are more knowledge-able and are superior to you. That's my explanation.
Plus you are obviously biased or uninformed since you are touting the possibility of a Wii-to PS360 gap with your N64 -> Xbox nonsense.
|
I get a lot of my information from Beyond3D, there are lot of knowlagable industry pros on there, very interesting discussion. You are clearly missinformed if you think that a console launched in late 2013 can't offer a standard console generational leap of 8-10x the capabilities of the last. In fact if MS and Sony don't offer such a leap they will need to also bring a Wii style change in input as consumers are unlikely to think that a new console that just offers PS360 level games in 1080p and 30fps is worth investing in the next generation especially as the current generation is not going anywhere.
As Carmak said
"The next-generation will be here soon, in a couple of years. That's going to be that much farther beyond that. It'll be another ten times as powerful as this. I'd be surprised if that doesn't last over a decade before people wind up saying, well, we've really tapped out everything you could possibly do on there."
"The other thing you fight is, the better games get the harder you have to go to give a delta people care about. That's going to be a challenge for the next-generation of consoles, to show that the pack-in title is going to look more awesome than what you get on the current ones that people will want to go spend $300 on a new console.
They'll be able to do it on the next generation, but it's going to be much harder. And whether it's even possible another generation after that is an open question. There are lots of valid reasons to like a stable platform, to be able to have stable skill sets and tool sets to be able to build things in a controlled way without that terrifying jump."
Even a full 8-10x leap may not offer an average gamer enough of a percived leap over this generation to be worth switching. Especially as current gen consoles won't be going away any time soon. Especially with the Wii U offering publishers an extra platform to offer ports on making that the lowest common denominator allowing them to continue making games at the current level. The Wii may have shown that the majority don't really care about advanced graphics but that was only by offering something that you couldn't get anywhere else, as tablets grow ever more powerful and support gamepads and offer TV output. Kinect 2.0 will not sell the Xbox next as most consumers will be happy with the 360 kinect and Move has done little to nothing for Sony. So basically if MS and Sony launch consoles that are not a Xbox to 360 leap at least then they will crash and burn as they will offer consumers little reason to upgrade and that will mean 3rd party publishers won't make the leap, leaving it up to exclusives to sell the next consoles a battle that Nintendo would win, Sony and MS are not going to let Nintendo win like that, if they are not willing to make the generation leap in power then they might as well just not launch new consoles as current generation consoles are still selling. The aim of next generation consoles is to offer new experainces that can't be done on the existing one and a slight leap in proccessing power won't be enough.
Whether MS and Sony like it or not they don't really have much choice in the matter, half leaps have only worked out well in the past once and that was the Wii, MS and Sony would be stupid to try and recreate that magic.
Also you are contradicting yourself before you claimed you didn't think that a true generation leap in power was impossible but now you are emplying that I am ininformed to think that such a leap is possible...