PullusPardus said:
Player1x3 said:
brendude13 said:
PullusPardus said: by the way i took all these from Phone not a straight screenshot, as you can see they're the same as the "Crappy" photos (like you guys say) that OP has posted. they really rushed this one, but everyone is praising them. |
They are praising them because when the graphics in this game are at it's best, they ARE the best.
Rushed or not, they deserve praise.
|
it makes it even funny, seeing as how he loves skyrim, and yet constantly complains about technical issues, when skyrim has more glitches, bugs and freezes than entire uncharted franchise all together. I've experienced more glitches in first 15 hours of skyrim, than i did in my 200 plus hours on UC2 only. And talking about rushed, there is reason why hundreds of thousands of players wait for bethesda to release a 200MB patch to fix an uncountable number of bugs & glitches, because the game is nearly unplayable, the game was just too rushed on launch
|
Skyrim took 6 years to make.
Uncharted 3 took 1 year (or less) to make.
which one is rushed? and stop comparing the two please.
|
actually Uncharted 3 took 2 years to complete. and Skyrim took 5.5 years
Can you count?
also what you said, doesnt really boad well for your argument, in fact it proves the opposite.
if it took 5 and a half years for Bethesda to complete a game, riddled with 1000's of bugs, glitches and hiccups, and it only took naughty dog 2 years to finish an extremely polished, graphics intensive game, with little to no bugs, glitches or hiccups; wouldnt that mean Bethesda rushed their game.
what did they spend all their time on if they couldnt release a finished game in over 5 years, yet another deveoper could in 2 years.