bouzane said:
Crazymann said: Ha ha!
Time for someone to post the "What Nintendo Create, We Take" picture again...
Still, I am intrigued. Will most definitely purchase if good! |
Nintendo invented cross-over fighting games? That certainly is news to me.
@ASStronaut
If serious, you really aren't much of a gamer :/
|
Wow! Someone is ultra-defensive! But... ok, I'll bite
While crossover games existed for a while before SSB on N64, it was the depth of the crossover and the smash/dmg system that was unique to Nintendo foray into fighting games. Based on what people are saying, when they think of a "Sony competitor to Smash Bros." they assume that those elements have a VERY strong possibility of being included... which would be a direct copy.
In fact, if they DON'T do that, then I won't be near as likely to buy it - because I want a Smash Bros. with Sony characters. If they give the characters fixed life or some other spin on the system, then it won't be the same.
Also, don't be too quick to judge other people's gaming passions by your standards of gaming. Someone who has played a few games of Tetris and only Tetris daily since 1987 is just as much a gamer as you are... and they may not know any of those characters or Smash Bros. characters either.
Granted, that may have been a troll question... but there are many gamers who may not like those francises and (yet) still play Madden or Gran Turismo.
EDIT:
And, I would like to point out that I don't know that FIGHTING game characters should by used much in this game. If I want to fight as Scorpion or Ryu, I'll play those games. A game of this type should be as eclectic as possible.