CC is cool. Never used CCP but I must assume that its just a more comfortable version of the CC. Still, I have to digress and say that the Cube controller is perfect for certain games, Smash Brothers comes to mind here. I just could never do Smash Bros ny good with a CC. And not only that, the Cube controller became the standard for two Smash Brothers games and two Mario Kart games which millions of people owned. Now I'm sure that using the Pad controller for Mario Kart will be fine since it'll be easy to adjust to. The learning curve for that game is very small, easy to learn. But configuring a new control scheme to a game like Smash Brothers? I'm not convinced. I won't make any abosolute statements now since I have yet to even see some of the Wii U games, but I do believe Nintendo is being a bit lazy here. Come now, If the Wii disc drive can play both Wii and Gamecube games, and the Wii U drive can play both Wii U and Wii games, whats stopping the great engineers behind the Wii U from coding it to play Gamecube games? I just had to vent sorry haha!

I'm sorry but I think you are making no sense right there. 

I know there are plenty of people that love the GCN controllers.  I suppose that the CCP isn't good enough for a basic controller?  I know the GCN controller is good but it is only marginally better than the CCP.  I don't even own a CCP (just 2 regular CC) and I still think the CC is decent enough for my VC needs (I don't use CC for FPS Wii shooters considering there is a better option with Wiimote/nunchuck).  I didn't even use the CC for MH3 and I stuck with the Wiimote/nunchuck control scheme.

I don't know the implementation details, but from my understanding the tablet is just a "dummy" device and I wouldn't be surprised if it doesn't (really) have any processing power or memory on it; and it only displays the data that is streamed to it. If this is truly the case, I wouldn't be surprised if the system uses up the same wireless bandwidth to display a static image of buttons as a detailed real-time rendered image.

The reason to take this approach is to keep the cost of the controller down because (outside of the cost of the screen) the tablet controller would be about as complicated and expensive as a conventional controller. With how inexpensive touch screens have gotten, it is possible that Nintendo could sell these controllers for $10 to $25 more than a conventional controller where it would be substantially more expensive to make them "smarter".

I dont think your going to get it, unless Ninty was willing to sell and you are willing to buy an expensive ass console